Resection of Early Colorectal Neoplasms Using Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study

<b>Background:</b> Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a reliable method that can replace surgery in the treatment of early colorectal cancer under certain conditions. <b>Aim:</b> The aim of the study was to analyze factors influencing the ESD procedure in early colorectal cancer, with the intention of improving its effectiveness. <b>Patients and Methods:</b> We conducted a multicenter, retrospective cohort study on 214 patients who underwent ESD procedures for early colorectal cancer from January 2016 to October 2023. <b>Results:</b><i>En bloc</i> resection was achieved in 197 (92.1%) of ESD procedures, R0 resection in 149 (69.6%), and curative resection in 54 (40.9%). The submucosal invasion was classified as level 1 (SM1) in 96 cases (45.3%), level 2 (SM2) in 61 cases (28.8%), and level 3 (SM3) in 36 cases (17%). R0 resection was achieved more often in the rectum-92 (81.4%), compared to the right-24 (64.9%) and left colon-33 (61.1%), <i>p</i> = 0.009. In rectal tumors, R0 resection was achieved in 51 (98.1%) SM1 invasion, 27 (73%) SM2 invasion, and 13 (65%) SM3 invasion (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Lateral and vertical resection margins were positive in 12 (7.7%) and 52 (25.2%) cases, respectively. Vertical resection margins were statistically more often positive in lesions located in the right colon-11 cases (28.9%) and left colon-21 cases (38.9%), than in rectum-20 cases (17.5%); <i>p</i> = 0.010. Complications were found in 32 (15%) cases of ESD procedure-perforation in 12 cases (5.6%) and delayed bleeding in four cases (1.9%). Procedures performed in the right colon were associated with a significantly higher risk of any complications (30%) and perforations (15%) than those performed in the rectum (10.3% and 2.6%) or the left colon (13.8% and 5.2%; <i>p</i> = 0.016; <i>p</i> = 0.015), respectively. <b>Conclusions:</b> ESD for early colon cancer is a viable strategy due to its effectiveness and low complication rate. The ESD technique performed in the rectum yields the best results; however, in the right colon, it still requires careful attention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226989
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resection of Early Colorectal Neoplasms Using Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study

Alberto Herreros de Tejada, Zuzanna Nowicka, Michał Spychalski, Katarzyna Winter et al.
5 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
2.09
article

Resection of Early Colorectal Neoplasms Using Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study

Alberto Herreros de Tejada, Zuzanna Nowicka, Michał Spychalski, Katarzyna Winter, Przemysław Kasprzyk, Noriko Suzuki
article en
5 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a reliable method that can replace surgery in the treatment of early colorectal cancer under certain conditions. <b>Aim:</b> The aim of the study was to analyze factors influencing the ESD procedure in early colorectal cancer, with the intention of improving its effectiveness. <b>Patients and Methods:</b> We conducted a multicenter, retrospective cohort study on 214 patients who underwent ESD procedures for early colorectal cancer from January 2016 to October 2023. <b>Results:</b><i>En bloc</i> resection was achieved in 197 (92.1%) of ESD procedures, R0 resection in 149 (69.6%), and curative resection in 54 (40.9%). The submucosal invasion was classified as level 1 (SM1) in 96 cases (45.3%), level 2 (SM2) in 61 cases (28.8%), and level 3 (SM3) in 36 cases (17%). R0 resection was achieved more often in the rectum-92 (81.4%), compared to the right-24 (64.9%) and left colon-33 (61.1%), <i>p</i> = 0.009. In rectal tumors, R0 resection was achieved in 51 (98.1%) SM1 invasion, 27 (73%) SM2 invasion, and 13 (65%) SM3 invasion (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Lateral and vertical resection margins were positive in 12 (7.7%) and 52 (25.2%) cases, respectively. Vertical resection margins were statistically more often positive in lesions located in the right colon-11 cases (28.9%) and left colon-21 cases (38.9%), than in rectum-20 cases (17.5%); <i>p</i> = 0.010. Complications were found in 32 (15%) cases of ESD procedure-perforation in 12 cases (5.6%) and delayed bleeding in four cases (1.9%). Procedures performed in the right colon were associated with a significantly higher risk of any complications (30%) and perforations (15%) than those performed in the rectum (10.3% and 2.6%) or the left colon (13.8% and 5.2%; <i>p</i> = 0.016; <i>p</i> = 0.015), respectively. <b>Conclusions:</b> ESD for early colon cancer is a viable strategy due to its effectiveness and low complication rate. The ESD technique performed in the rectum yields the best results; however, in the right colon, it still requires careful attention.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 13(22)
London North West Healthcare NHS Trust (GB), Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda (ES), Medical University of Lodz (PL), Łukasiewicz Research Network – PORT Polish Center for Technology Development (PL), St Mark's Hospital (GB)
Uniwersytet Łódzki
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
2.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.