Aeration Optimization for the Biodrying of Market Waste Using Negative Ventilation: A Lysimeter Study

This study investigates the optimization of aeration rates for the biodrying of market waste using negative-pressure ventilation. Market waste, characterized by a high moisture content (MC) and rapid decomposition, presents challenges in waste management. Over 12 days, three aeration rates (ARs) of 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 m3/kg/day were examined, and the most effective continuous ventilation configuration was identified in terms of heat generation, moisture reduction, and biodrying efficiency. The results indicate that the most effective AR for heat retention and moisture removal was 0.2 m3/kg/day, achieving a 6.63% MC reduction and a 9.12% low heating value (LHV) increase. Gas analysis showed that, while AR 0.2 supported high microbial activity during the initial 7 days, AR 0.6 sustained higher overall CO2 production due to its greater aeration rate. The findings also suggest that the biodrying of market waste with a high initial MC can achieve significant weight loss and leachate generation when paired with a high aeration rate of 0.6 m3/kg/day, with a 69.8% weight loss and increased waste compaction being recorded. The study suggests that variable ARs can optimize biodrying, making market waste more suitable for conversion to refuse-derived fuel or landfill pre-treatment and improving waste-to-energy processes and sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clean Technologies
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol6040073
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aeration Optimization for the Biodrying of Market Waste Using Negative Ventilation: A Lysimeter Study

Noppharit Sutthasil, Komsilp Wangyao, Sirintornthep Towprayoon, Suthum Patumsawad et al.
6 citations
Clean Technologies
Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
2.00
article

Aeration Optimization for the Biodrying of Market Waste Using Negative Ventilation: A Lysimeter Study

Noppharit Sutthasil, Komsilp Wangyao, Sirintornthep Towprayoon, Suthum Patumsawad, Abhisit Bhatsada, Ye Nyi Nyi Lwin
article en
6 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the optimization of aeration rates for the biodrying of market waste using negative-pressure ventilation. Market waste, characterized by a high moisture content (MC) and rapid decomposition, presents challenges in waste management. Over 12 days, three aeration rates (ARs) of 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 m3/kg/day were examined, and the most effective continuous ventilation configuration was identified in terms of heat generation, moisture reduction, and biodrying efficiency. The results indicate that the most effective AR for heat retention and moisture removal was 0.2 m3/kg/day, achieving a 6.63% MC reduction and a 9.12% low heating value (LHV) increase. Gas analysis showed that, while AR 0.2 supported high microbial activity during the initial 7 days, AR 0.6 sustained higher overall CO2 production due to its greater aeration rate. The findings also suggest that the biodrying of market waste with a high initial MC can achieve significant weight loss and leachate generation when paired with a high aeration rate of 0.6 m3/kg/day, with a 69.8% weight loss and increased waste compaction being recorded. The study suggests that variable ARs can optimize biodrying, making market waste more suitable for conversion to refuse-derived fuel or landfill pre-treatment and improving waste-to-energy processes and sustainability.

Clean TechnologiesVol. 6(4)
Joint Graduate School of Energy and Environment (TH), Mae Fah Luang University (TH), King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi (TH), King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok (TH)
King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
2.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.