Improved Guarantees for the A Priori TSP

We revisit the a priori TSP (with independent activation) and prove stronger approximation guarantees than were previously known. In the a priori TSP, we are given a metric space (V, c) and an activation probability p(v) for each customer [Formula: see text]. We ask for a TSP tour T for V that minimizes the expected length after cutting T short by skipping the inactive customers. All known approximation algorithms select a nonempty subset S of the customers and construct a master route solution, consisting of a TSP tour for S and two edges connecting every customer [Formula: see text] to a nearest customer in S. We address the following questions. If we randomly sample the subset S, what should be the sampling probabilities? How much worse than the optimum can the best master route solution be? The answers to these questions (we provide almost matching lower and upper bounds) lead to improved approximation guarantees: less than 3.1 with randomized sampling and less than 5.9 with a deterministic polynomial-time algorithm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematics of Operations Research
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.2023.0322
Primary Topic
Optimization and Packing Problems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improved Guarantees for the A Priori TSP

Jens Vygen, Jannis Blauth, Meike Neuwohner, Luise Puhlmann
Mathematics of Operations Research
Optimization and Packing Problems
article

Improved Guarantees for the A Priori TSP

Jens Vygen, Jannis Blauth, Meike Neuwohner, Luise Puhlmann
article en

Abstract

We revisit the a priori TSP (with independent activation) and prove stronger approximation guarantees than were previously known. In the a priori TSP, we are given a metric space (V, c) and an activation probability p(v) for each customer [Formula: see text]. We ask for a TSP tour T for V that minimizes the expected length after cutting T short by skipping the inactive customers. All known approximation algorithms select a nonempty subset S of the customers and construct a master route solution, consisting of a TSP tour for S and two edges connecting every customer [Formula: see text] to a nearest customer in S. We address the following questions. If we randomly sample the subset S, what should be the sampling probabilities? How much worse than the optimum can the best master route solution be? The answers to these questions (we provide almost matching lower and upper bounds) lead to improved approximation guarantees: less than 3.1 with randomized sampling and less than 5.9 with a deterministic polynomial-time algorithm.

Mathematics of Operations ResearchVol. 50(4)
University of Bonn (DE), Center for Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science (US), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Optimization and Packing Problems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.