Energy management system of an Electric Vehicle - IEEE VTS Challenge 2024

In this paper, we illustrate two families of energy management strategies for an electric vehicle equipped with an internal permanent magnet motor supplied by a battery and a supercapacitor (SC). The strategies aim to minimize the size and energy consumption of the storage system, as well as the losses and costs associated with power electronics converters. Both strategies share the same motor control approach, designed to maximize torque per Ampere, thereby reducing the required current to maintain a specified speed profile. In terms of current distribution between battery and SC, the first strategy (Spref) splits current into low-frequency components to the battery and high frequencies to the SC. A PID controller which reference depends on vehicle speed prevents the SC from reaching a low charge or high charge status. Instead, the second strategy (Ploss) focuses on optimally splitting the current demand to minimize the power losses on the supply side. Again, a PID controller governs the SC voltage. The methodologies have undergone testing across various speed profiles. The results and comparison are discussed for their potential suitability for the IEEE VTS Challenge 2024.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/vppc63154.2024.10755284
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy management system of an Electric Vehicle - IEEE VTS Challenge 2024

Andrea Sassella, Giovanni Righetti, Basilio Lenzo, Mariagrazia Tristano et al.
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
article

Energy management system of an Electric Vehicle - IEEE VTS Challenge 2024

Andrea Sassella, Giovanni Righetti, Basilio Lenzo, Mariagrazia Tristano, Mario Costantini, Leonardo Serena
article en

Abstract

In this paper, we illustrate two families of energy management strategies for an electric vehicle equipped with an internal permanent magnet motor supplied by a battery and a supercapacitor (SC). The strategies aim to minimize the size and energy consumption of the storage system, as well as the losses and costs associated with power electronics converters. Both strategies share the same motor control approach, designed to maximize torque per Ampere, thereby reducing the required current to maintain a specified speed profile. In terms of current distribution between battery and SC, the first strategy (Spref) splits current into low-frequency components to the battery and high frequencies to the SC. A PID controller which reference depends on vehicle speed prevents the SC from reaching a low charge or high charge status. Instead, the second strategy (Ploss) focuses on optimally splitting the current demand to minimize the power losses on the supply side. Again, a PID controller governs the SC voltage. The methodologies have undergone testing across various speed profiles. The results and comparison are discussed for their potential suitability for the IEEE VTS Challenge 2024.

Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Energy management system of an Electric Vehicle - IEEE VTS Challenge 2024 — Andrea Sassella, Giovanni Righetti, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS