A Comparative Analysis of CNN, LSTM, and Autoencoder Models of IoT Intrusion Detection

With the rise of Internet of Things (IoT) networks, the need for faster, complex and optimized anomaly detection system to protect the network is more important. This research paper offers a comparison between three emerging deep learning algorithms: Autoencoders, LSTM networks, and CNN towards anomaly detection in IoT setting. Using dataset, IoT-23, we demonstrate these techniques using several evaluation metrics such as accuracy, Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Precision-Recall Area Under Curve (PR-AUC). CNNs were the top-performing model with the highest PR-AUC, the lowest MAE, and significantly higher accuracy which we set as the new record in the field. When tested and evaluated, LSTMs had better accuracy and PR-AUC as compared to other algorithms such as Autoencoders which were also found to be useful.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icait65209.2024.10754916
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of CNN, LSTM, and Autoencoder Models of IoT Intrusion Detection

Aung Htein Maw, Shwe Sin Myat Than, Akari Myint Soe
2 citations
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
0.70
article

A Comparative Analysis of CNN, LSTM, and Autoencoder Models of IoT Intrusion Detection

Aung Htein Maw, Shwe Sin Myat Than, Akari Myint Soe
article en
2 citations

Abstract

With the rise of Internet of Things (IoT) networks, the need for faster, complex and optimized anomaly detection system to protect the network is more important. This research paper offers a comparison between three emerging deep learning algorithms: Autoencoders, LSTM networks, and CNN towards anomaly detection in IoT setting. Using dataset, IoT-23, we demonstrate these techniques using several evaluation metrics such as accuracy, Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Precision-Recall Area Under Curve (PR-AUC). CNNs were the top-performing model with the highest PR-AUC, the lowest MAE, and significantly higher accuracy which we set as the new record in the field. When tested and evaluated, LSTMs had better accuracy and PR-AUC as compared to other algorithms such as Autoencoders which were also found to be useful.

University Of Information Technology (MM)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
0.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.