Is Everlasting Security Necessary?

Security professionals are now part of the risk analysis and business team. Businesses and organizations must protect the valuable information they use in conducting their core functions. Loss or compromise of that information can damage the organization up to and including bankruptcy. A survey and projections report by a cybersecurity firm estimated that $\mathbf{7 5 \%}$ of companies based in the US are prone to cyber-attacks. Also, the revenue loss by vulnerable companies due to cyber-attacks may exceed 452 billion dollars in 2024. Most businesspeople are not well versed in cybersecurity and protecting information, but they understand profits, loss, return on investment, loss prevention, and the math behind them. Often, security is seen as a loss center, making it difficult for security personnel to justify taking measures to safeguard information or informationcarrying equipment and networks. Encryption is one example of such vital but ethereal costs. Convincing the business side of operations to implement security requires speaking their language. This paper suggests a way to present encryption in a provably cost-effective manner related to return on investment. Simultaneously, an outline of a strategically adaptive approach to security is introduced.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/uemcon62879.2024.10754715
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Everlasting Security Necessary?

Albert Carlson, Sai Ranganath Mikkilineni, Benjamin Williams
2 citations
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
4.46
article

Is Everlasting Security Necessary?

Albert Carlson, Sai Ranganath Mikkilineni, Benjamin Williams
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Security professionals are now part of the risk analysis and business team. Businesses and organizations must protect the valuable information they use in conducting their core functions. Loss or compromise of that information can damage the organization up to and including bankruptcy. A survey and projections report by a cybersecurity firm estimated that $\mathbf{7 5 \%}$ of companies based in the US are prone to cyber-attacks. Also, the revenue loss by vulnerable companies due to cyber-attacks may exceed 452 billion dollars in 2024. Most businesspeople are not well versed in cybersecurity and protecting information, but they understand profits, loss, return on investment, loss prevention, and the math behind them. Often, security is seen as a loss center, making it difficult for security personnel to justify taking measures to safeguard information or informationcarrying equipment and networks. Encryption is one example of such vital but ethereal costs. Convincing the business side of operations to implement security requires speaking their language. This paper suggests a way to present encryption in a provably cost-effective manner related to return on investment. Simultaneously, an outline of a strategically adaptive approach to security is introduced.

Delaware State University (US), University of Idaho (US), Austin Community College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
4.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.