Social Media Fake News Detection Using Machine Learning Models and Feature Extraction Techniques

Due to continuous technological advances, fake news is rampant on social media platforms, making it an urgent area of research. This research investigates various Machine Learning (ML) algorithms and feature extraction techniques to classify news as real or fake. The study compares different ML models, such as Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), K-Nearest Neighbors (K-NN), Naïve Bayes (NB), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), and Stacked ensemble models. Six feature extraction methods were utilized, measured, and compared, including Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF), Bag of Words (BOW), 2-grams, 3-grams, (1-2) grams, and (1-2-3) grams. The experiments were on a merged dataset for supervised learning and a separate test dataset for blind testing. The results showed that SVM, DT, and Stacked models achieve up to 99% accuracy with TF-IDF and BOW on the merged dataset. For the blind testing, K-NN for BOW and MLP for TF-IDF had an accuracy of 64% on separate test datasets. Lastly, the results demonstrated that n-grams helped to understand the context and the order of words, but a higher value of $\mathbf{n}$ increased dimensionality and caused sparsity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/uemcon62879.2024.10754749
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social Media Fake News Detection Using Machine Learning Models and Feature Extraction Techniques

Xiyuan Liu, William Bradley Glisson, Zuhair Tahat, Hosam Alamleh et al.
2 citations
Misinformation and Its Impacts
2.26
article

Social Media Fake News Detection Using Machine Learning Models and Feature Extraction Techniques

Xiyuan Liu, William Bradley Glisson, Zuhair Tahat, Hosam Alamleh, Majd Z. Tahat, Ayman Gharaibeh
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Due to continuous technological advances, fake news is rampant on social media platforms, making it an urgent area of research. This research investigates various Machine Learning (ML) algorithms and feature extraction techniques to classify news as real or fake. The study compares different ML models, such as Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), K-Nearest Neighbors (K-NN), Naïve Bayes (NB), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), and Stacked ensemble models. Six feature extraction methods were utilized, measured, and compared, including Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF), Bag of Words (BOW), 2-grams, 3-grams, (1-2) grams, and (1-2-3) grams. The experiments were on a merged dataset for supervised learning and a separate test dataset for blind testing. The results showed that SVM, DT, and Stacked models achieve up to 99% accuracy with TF-IDF and BOW on the merged dataset. For the blind testing, K-NN for BOW and MLP for TF-IDF had an accuracy of 64% on separate test datasets. Lastly, the results demonstrated that n-grams helped to understand the context and the order of words, but a higher value of $\mathbf{n}$ increased dimensionality and caused sparsity.

University of North Carolina Wilmington (US), Yarmouk University (JO), Louisiana Tech University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Social Media Fake News Detection Using Machine Learning Models and Feature Extraction Techniques — Xiyuan Liu, William Bradley Glisson, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS