Two-Part Controller Design for Switched-Capacitor Based Buck–Boost Converter

Many of the buck–boost topologies have lower duty ratio range per unit voltage gain (DMR). In this article, controller design aspects, multi-mode operation of a switched-capacitor bridge based buck–boost converter (SCBDBBC) exhibiting better DMR is investigated. Presence of switched-capacitor bridge enhances the duty ratio range for bucking operation while the existence of two switches offers degree of freedom to realize multi-mode operations. These are: 1) buck–boost; 2) standalone boost; and 3) standalone buck operation. By exercising the degree of freedom associated with two switches, under the buck–boost operation three different multi-mode operations are feasible which are: 1) equal duty ratios with synchronized gate signals (<italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">D<sub>S</sub></i><sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sub> = <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">D<sub>S</sub></i><sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub>); 2) unequal duty ratios with synchronized gate signals (case-1: <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">D<sub>S</sub></i><sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sub> > <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">D<sub>S</sub></i><sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub>); and 3) unequal duty ratios with synchronized gate signals (case-2: <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">D<sub>S</sub></i><sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sub> < <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">D<sub>S</sub></i><sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub>). Mathematical analysis is established for both the cases (case-1 and case-2). From voltage gain point of view both of these schemes result in identical gain, but the <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">D<sub>S</sub></i><sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sub> < <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">D<sub>S</sub></i><sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> operation results in low source current ripple compared to equal duty ratio operation. Hence, detailed investigations are given for SCBDBBC under case-2 control. Since there are two controlling inputs (<italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">D<sub>S</sub></i><sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sub>, <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">D<sub>S</sub></i><sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub>) and one controlled output (<italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">v<sub>o</sub></i>), two controllers are designed using two-input single-output (TISO) control theory. To demonstrate the SCBDBBC operation and TISO based two-part controller design, a 48 to 24 V (in bucking)/ 60 V (in boosting) with power rating 24 ∼ 60 W is chosen for experiments. The SCBDBBC multi-mode operation in standalone buck and boost operations are demonstrated in addition to buck–boost conversion. The analytical findings are in close agreement with experimental observations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2024.3485719
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Advanced DC-DC Converters
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.83
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two-Part Controller Design for Switched-Capacitor Based Buck–Boost Converter

Utkarsha Dey, Mummadi Veerachary
4 citations
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
Advanced DC-DC Converters
0.83
article

Two-Part Controller Design for Switched-Capacitor Based Buck–Boost Converter

Utkarsha Dey, Mummadi Veerachary
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Many of the buck–boost topologies have lower duty ratio range per unit voltage gain (DMR). In this article, controller design aspects, multi-mode operation of a switched-capacitor bridge based buck–boost converter (SCBDBBC) exhibiting better DMR is investigated. Presence of switched-capacitor bridge enhances the duty ratio range for bucking operation while the existence of two switches offers degree of freedom to realize multi-mode operations. These are: 1) buck–boost; 2) standalone boost; and 3) standalone buck operation. By exercising the degree of freedom associated with two switches, under the buck–boost operation three different multi-mode operations are feasible which are: 1) equal duty ratios with synchronized gate signals (<italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">D<sub>S</sub></i><sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sub> = <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">D<sub>S</sub></i><sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub>); 2) unequal duty ratios with synchronized gate signals (case-1: <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">D<sub>S</sub></i><sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sub> > <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">D<sub>S</sub></i><sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub>); and 3) unequal duty ratios with synchronized gate signals (case-2: <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">D<sub>S</sub></i><sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sub> < <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">D<sub>S</sub></i><sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub>). Mathematical analysis is established for both the cases (case-1 and case-2). From voltage gain point of view both of these schemes result in identical gain, but the <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">D<sub>S</sub></i><sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sub> < <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">D<sub>S</sub></i><sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> operation results in low source current ripple compared to equal duty ratio operation. Hence, detailed investigations are given for SCBDBBC under case-2 control. Since there are two controlling inputs (<italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">D<sub>S</sub></i><sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sub>, <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">D<sub>S</sub></i><sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub>) and one controlled output (<italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">v<sub>o</sub></i>), two controllers are designed using two-input single-output (TISO) control theory. To demonstrate the SCBDBBC operation and TISO based two-part controller design, a 48 to 24 V (in bucking)/ 60 V (in boosting) with power rating 24 ∼ 60 W is chosen for experiments. The SCBDBBC multi-mode operation in standalone buck and boost operations are demonstrated in addition to buck–boost conversion. The analytical findings are in close agreement with experimental observations.

IEEE Transactions on Industrial ElectronicsVol. 72(6)
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Advanced DC-DC Converters
0.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.