A Comparison of Gate Resistance and Gate Voltage Manipulation Active Gate Drivers for Silicon Carbide MOSFETs

Numerous studies in power electronics literature have focused on gate resistance manipulation (GRM) and gate voltage manipulation (GVM) Active Gate Drivers (AGD) for Silicon Carbide (SiC) MOSFETs. Despite this, there has been a lack of direct, conceptual comparisons between these two methodologies. This paper presents a comprehensive comparison of GRMAGD and GVMAGD with pulse-to-pulse adaptation. Analysis, conducted under equivalent conditions in double pulse measurements, reveals that while both methods exhibit similar switching performance in active turn-on scenarios, GRMAGDs demonstrate superior switching efficiency during active turn-off switching. It is additionally observed that GVMAGDs, using a specific gate driving voltage pattern, are more sensitive to variations in threshold voltage. Considering these factors, along with their lower complexity and cost, GRMAGDs emerge as the more favorable option over GVMAGDs in applications with widely varying load.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ecceeurope62508.2024.10751834
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparison of Gate Resistance and Gate Voltage Manipulation Active Gate Drivers for Silicon Carbide MOSFETs

Mark‐M. Bakran, Michael J. Frank
2 citations
Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design
0.42
article

A Comparison of Gate Resistance and Gate Voltage Manipulation Active Gate Drivers for Silicon Carbide MOSFETs

Mark‐M. Bakran, Michael J. Frank
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Numerous studies in power electronics literature have focused on gate resistance manipulation (GRM) and gate voltage manipulation (GVM) Active Gate Drivers (AGD) for Silicon Carbide (SiC) MOSFETs. Despite this, there has been a lack of direct, conceptual comparisons between these two methodologies. This paper presents a comprehensive comparison of GRMAGD and GVMAGD with pulse-to-pulse adaptation. Analysis, conducted under equivalent conditions in double pulse measurements, reveals that while both methods exhibit similar switching performance in active turn-on scenarios, GRMAGDs demonstrate superior switching efficiency during active turn-off switching. It is additionally observed that GVMAGDs, using a specific gate driving voltage pattern, are more sensitive to variations in threshold voltage. Considering these factors, along with their lower complexity and cost, GRMAGDs emerge as the more favorable option over GVMAGDs in applications with widely varying load.

University of Bayreuth (DE)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design
0.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.