Exploring Bounds in Complementary Formulations for Electroquasistatics

It is well established that complementary formulations for static electromagnetic problems yield upper and lower energy bounds, a result that has been demonstrated only numerically for magnetoquasistatic (MQS) problems. However, this aspect remains completely unexplored for electroquasistatic (EQS) problems. The primary objective of this article is to solve an EQS problem for the first time using two complementary formulations. The secondary aim is to address the existing gap in the literature by numerically investigating whether energy bounds exist for EQS problems, following the approach previously applied to MQS problems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tmag.2024.3502700
Primary Topic
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Bounds in Complementary Formulations for Electroquasistatics

Ruben Specogna, Aldi Hoxha, Antonino Vacalebre
IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
article

Exploring Bounds in Complementary Formulations for Electroquasistatics

Ruben Specogna, Aldi Hoxha, Antonino Vacalebre
article en

Abstract

It is well established that complementary formulations for static electromagnetic problems yield upper and lower energy bounds, a result that has been demonstrated only numerically for magnetoquasistatic (MQS) problems. However, this aspect remains completely unexplored for electroquasistatic (EQS) problems. The primary objective of this article is to solve an EQS problem for the first time using two complementary formulations. The secondary aim is to address the existing gap in the literature by numerically investigating whether energy bounds exist for EQS problems, following the approach previously applied to MQS problems.

IEEE Transactions on MagneticsVol. 61(1)
University of Udine (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.