Survey of bloodstain pattern analysts regarding pattern classifications on assorted fabrics

Because bloodstain pattern analysis (BPA) on absorbent surfaces, such as fabrics, is far more complex than its application on hard, nonporous surfaces, pattern type may be interpreted differently between fabric substrates and by analysts with more or less experience. Four bloodstain pattern types (impact spatter, transfer, drip stains, and cast-off) were created on seven fabrics (cotton, satin polyester, rayon, blended polyester/spandex, blended nylon/spandex, blended modal/polyester/spandex, and terry cloth), foamboard, or butcher paper and then photographed. A survey questionnaire that asked respondents to classify 16 patterns as to general pattern type, specific pattern type, and directionality was developed and disseminated among bloodstain pattern analysts. Respondents (n = 32, divided into five experience levels) classified the bloodstains differently based upon amounts of training and experience, the pattern type, and the substrate type. The ability to accurately classify the specific pattern type overall (p-value < 0.0002) as wells as on fabric (p-value < 0.001) was dependent upon respondent experience level. The more experienced respondents were less likely to specifically classify patterns than the less experienced respondents (p-value < 0.001). Furthermore, the ability to accurately classify the specific pattern type was dependent upon whether the pattern had been created on fabric or some other substrate (p-value < 0.0000000001). However, if the proper morphology was present in the stain, it was found that BPA on certain fabrics was possible. This finding supports the need for further research and the development of guidelines and standards for bloodstain pattern analysis on fabric materials. • Accuracy of BPA on fabric substrates is linked to analyst experience level. • Experienced practitioners are more likely to not attempt BPA on fabrics. • Substrate plays larger role than pattern type in ability to classify bloodstains. • Polyester masked/warped bloodstain features more than other examined fabrics. • If proper stain morphology is present, it may be possible to perform BPA on fabric.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forensic Science International Reports
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsir.2024.100394
Primary Topic
Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Survey of bloodstain pattern analysts regarding pattern classifications on assorted fabrics

Travis J. Worst, Crystal M. Oechsle, Dylan J. Drazdik, David M. Hammond
Forensic Science International Reports
Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
article

Survey of bloodstain pattern analysts regarding pattern classifications on assorted fabrics

Travis J. Worst, Crystal M. Oechsle, Dylan J. Drazdik, David M. Hammond
article en

Abstract

Because bloodstain pattern analysis (BPA) on absorbent surfaces, such as fabrics, is far more complex than its application on hard, nonporous surfaces, pattern type may be interpreted differently between fabric substrates and by analysts with more or less experience. Four bloodstain pattern types (impact spatter, transfer, drip stains, and cast-off) were created on seven fabrics (cotton, satin polyester, rayon, blended polyester/spandex, blended nylon/spandex, blended modal/polyester/spandex, and terry cloth), foamboard, or butcher paper and then photographed. A survey questionnaire that asked respondents to classify 16 patterns as to general pattern type, specific pattern type, and directionality was developed and disseminated among bloodstain pattern analysts. Respondents (n = 32, divided into five experience levels) classified the bloodstains differently based upon amounts of training and experience, the pattern type, and the substrate type. The ability to accurately classify the specific pattern type overall (p-value < 0.0002) as wells as on fabric (p-value < 0.001) was dependent upon respondent experience level. The more experienced respondents were less likely to specifically classify patterns than the less experienced respondents (p-value < 0.001). Furthermore, the ability to accurately classify the specific pattern type was dependent upon whether the pattern had been created on fabric or some other substrate (p-value < 0.0000000001). However, if the proper morphology was present in the stain, it was found that BPA on certain fabrics was possible. This finding supports the need for further research and the development of guidelines and standards for bloodstain pattern analysis on fabric materials. • Accuracy of BPA on fabric substrates is linked to analyst experience level. • Experienced practitioners are more likely to not attempt BPA on fabrics. • Substrate plays larger role than pattern type in ability to classify bloodstains. • Polyester masked/warped bloodstain features more than other examined fabrics. • If proper stain morphology is present, it may be possible to perform BPA on fabric.

Forensic Science International ReportsVol. 10
Bowling Green State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.