A Bayesian Optimization Method for Finding the Worst-Case Scenarios of Autonomous Vehicles

Scenario-based testing has become a crucial method for certifying the safety of autonomous vehicles amidst the rapid advancement of autonomous driving technology. The exploration of worst-case scenarios, which plays a vital role in safety assessments and accelerated improvements of autonomous driving systems, has posed challenges due to the high dimensionality of parameters and the uncertainty of the decisions of autonomous driving systems. To address these challenges, a Bayesian optimization framework was proposed herein as a solution. Surrogate models, including two Gaussian process-based and five non-Gaussian process-based models, are employed to replace part of the costly simulation models, to overcome the challenge of high dimensionality. The Jackknife and Bootstrap methods are used to estimate variance and calculate the acquisition function. Additionally, a differential evolutionary algorithm is employed to achieve efficient solutions while balancing exploration and exploitation, to overcome the challenge of output uncertainty. The proposed framework is validated through experimental results. It successfully identifies the worst-case scenarios in all three cases and the average number of tests for the optimal model in the most complex 9-dimensional scenario is less than 400. Notably, the approach using the Random Forest (RF) surrogate model achieves the highest search success rate in all three cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2024.3490616
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Bayesian Optimization Method for Finding the Worst-Case Scenarios of Autonomous Vehicles

Ye Tian, Jian Sun, Yan Huang
5 citations
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
1.02
article

A Bayesian Optimization Method for Finding the Worst-Case Scenarios of Autonomous Vehicles

Ye Tian, Jian Sun, Yan Huang
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Scenario-based testing has become a crucial method for certifying the safety of autonomous vehicles amidst the rapid advancement of autonomous driving technology. The exploration of worst-case scenarios, which plays a vital role in safety assessments and accelerated improvements of autonomous driving systems, has posed challenges due to the high dimensionality of parameters and the uncertainty of the decisions of autonomous driving systems. To address these challenges, a Bayesian optimization framework was proposed herein as a solution. Surrogate models, including two Gaussian process-based and five non-Gaussian process-based models, are employed to replace part of the costly simulation models, to overcome the challenge of high dimensionality. The Jackknife and Bootstrap methods are used to estimate variance and calculate the acquisition function. Additionally, a differential evolutionary algorithm is employed to achieve efficient solutions while balancing exploration and exploitation, to overcome the challenge of output uncertainty. The proposed framework is validated through experimental results. It successfully identifies the worst-case scenarios in all three cases and the average number of tests for the optimal model in the most complex 9-dimensional scenario is less than 400. Notably, the approach using the Random Forest (RF) surrogate model achieves the highest search success rate in all three cases.

IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation SystemsVol. 26(1)
Tongji University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
1.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.