“Scientists are People too”: Biology Students Relate More to Scientists When They are Humanized in Course Materials

Featuring scientists in classroom materials provides opportunities for students to relate to scientists as role models and see themselves in science. However, it is unclear what information students find most relatable when encountering scientists throughout their education. In this study, we manipulated the amount and type of information provided about scientists featured in biology courses. Within the context of activities focused on a scientist's research study and data, we provided students with either no personal information about the scientist (Control treatment), pictures of the scientist (Visual treatment), or pictures and humanizing details about the scientist (Humanizing treatment). We asked students to describe how they related to the featured scientist, and qualitatively coded responses. Results showed that students related to the scientist's 1) professional research interests (e.g., research topic, science as a career) and 2) personal information (e.g., life experiences, hobbies, personality characteristics, race/ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic status). In addition, we observed differences in how students related to scientists across our treatments. Students were twice as likely to relate to featured scientists, and related in a greater variety of ways, when course materials included personal, humanizing information. We discuss implications for curriculum development and call for intentionality in how we present scientists throughout biology education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CBE—Life Sciences Education
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.24-02-0045
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Science Education and Perceptions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.74

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Scientists are People too”: Biology Students Relate More to Scientists When They are Humanized in Course Materials

Melissa K. Kjelvik, Ash T. Zemenick, Marjorie G. Weber, Cissy J. Ballen et al.
6 citations
CBE—Life Sciences Education
Science Education and Perceptions
4.74
article

“Scientists are People too”: Biology Students Relate More to Scientists When They are Humanized in Course Materials

Melissa K. Kjelvik, Ash T. Zemenick, Marjorie G. Weber, Cissy J. Ballen, Emily P. Driessen, Elizabeth H. Schultheis, Robin A. Costello, Rachel M. Youngblood
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Featuring scientists in classroom materials provides opportunities for students to relate to scientists as role models and see themselves in science. However, it is unclear what information students find most relatable when encountering scientists throughout their education. In this study, we manipulated the amount and type of information provided about scientists featured in biology courses. Within the context of activities focused on a scientist's research study and data, we provided students with either no personal information about the scientist (Control treatment), pictures of the scientist (Visual treatment), or pictures and humanizing details about the scientist (Humanizing treatment). We asked students to describe how they related to the featured scientist, and qualitatively coded responses. Results showed that students related to the scientist's 1) professional research interests (e.g., research topic, science as a career) and 2) personal information (e.g., life experiences, hobbies, personality characteristics, race/ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic status). In addition, we observed differences in how students related to scientists across our treatments. Students were twice as likely to relate to featured scientists, and related in a greater variety of ways, when course materials included personal, humanizing information. We discuss implications for curriculum development and call for intentionality in how we present scientists throughout biology education.

CBE—Life Sciences EducationVol. 23(4)
University of Minnesota (US), University of Michigan (US), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US), Auburn University (US), Michigan State University (US)
National Science Foundation, Auburn University
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Science Education and Perceptions
4.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.