En busca del reenvío perdido: Un análisis crítico de la solución prevista para la impugnación de la sentencia condenatoria en el Código Procesal Penal Federal de la República Argentina

This article presents a normative argument against the ban on retrial in the appellate stage in the Federal Criminal Procedure Code of the Argentine Republic. According to the article, this rule results in only factually innocent appellants being able to seek a review after conviction. The rationale behind the article bonds this rule with the phenomenon of Innocentrism and the defense of actual innocence as the primary value of the criminal process. To this end, the article analyses both the representative literature of the Innocence Movement and its reform proposals, and the critiques of these. With this theoretical framework, the article argues that a series of values identified with the concept of legal innocence and due process do not receive due attention in the appellate stage in the Federal Criminal Procedure Code of Argentina. Lastly, the article posits that the provision of retrial would broaden the possibilities for adequate resolution for different cases of injustice in the criminal process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v10i3.1082
Primary Topic
Legal processes and jurisprudence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

En busca del reenvío perdido: Un análisis crítico de la solución prevista para la impugnación de la sentencia condenatoria en el Código Procesal Penal Federal de la República Argentina

Ernesto Matías Díaz
1 links
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal
Legal processes and jurisprudence
article

En busca del reenvío perdido: Un análisis crítico de la solución prevista para la impugnación de la sentencia condenatoria en el Código Procesal Penal Federal de la República Argentina

Ernesto Matías Díaz
article en

Abstract

This article presents a normative argument against the ban on retrial in the appellate stage in the Federal Criminal Procedure Code of the Argentine Republic. According to the article, this rule results in only factually innocent appellants being able to seek a review after conviction. The rationale behind the article bonds this rule with the phenomenon of Innocentrism and the defense of actual innocence as the primary value of the criminal process. To this end, the article analyses both the representative literature of the Innocence Movement and its reform proposals, and the critiques of these. With this theoretical framework, the article argues that a series of values identified with the concept of legal innocence and due process do not receive due attention in the appellate stage in the Federal Criminal Procedure Code of Argentina. Lastly, the article posits that the provision of retrial would broaden the possibilities for adequate resolution for different cases of injustice in the criminal process.

Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual PenalVol. 10(3)
Universidad de Buenos Aires (AR)
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Universidad de Buenos Aires
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Legal processes and jurisprudence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.