Analysis of cellular response to photodynamic treatment using digital holographic microscopy, SLIM, and FLIM

The response of cells of different origin to photodynamic treatment in vitro was studied using two realizations of quantitative phase imaging (QPI): off-axis digital holographic microscopy and spatial light interference microscopy (SLIM), and using fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM). Holographic techniques were shown to allow noninvasive monitoring and analysis of the response of both individual cells in a sample and their entire population to photodynamic treatment. Dynamics of changes in the phase shift introduced by cells provided information on cell death type and rate. Utilization of a low-coherence radiation source in the SLIM realization ensured reduced measurement error due to an absence of coherent noise. Changes in the fluorescence intensity and decay time of the applied chlorin-based photosensitizer in cells were shown to be due to photobleaching of the photosensitizer, rather than to intracellular processes occurring in the course of cell death. The observed variations in optical and morphological parameters of cells as a function of treatment dose were shown to conform to the specific cell death pathways. The advantages and disadvantages of each technique are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3035916
Primary Topic
Digital Holography and Microscopy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of cellular response to photodynamic treatment using digital holographic microscopy, SLIM, and FLIM

O. S. Vasyutinskiǐ, А.В. Салова, А.А. Жихорева, А.В. Белашов et al.
Digital Holography and Microscopy
article

Analysis of cellular response to photodynamic treatment using digital holographic microscopy, SLIM, and FLIM

O. S. Vasyutinskiǐ, А.В. Салова, А.А. Жихорева, А.В. Белашов, И. К. Литвинов, И. В. Семенова, T. N. Belyaeva, Е. С. Корнилова
article en

Abstract

The response of cells of different origin to photodynamic treatment in vitro was studied using two realizations of quantitative phase imaging (QPI): off-axis digital holographic microscopy and spatial light interference microscopy (SLIM), and using fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM). Holographic techniques were shown to allow noninvasive monitoring and analysis of the response of both individual cells in a sample and their entire population to photodynamic treatment. Dynamics of changes in the phase shift introduced by cells provided information on cell death type and rate. Utilization of a low-coherence radiation source in the SLIM realization ensured reduced measurement error due to an absence of coherent noise. Changes in the fluorescence intensity and decay time of the applied chlorin-based photosensitizer in cells were shown to be due to photobleaching of the photosensitizer, rather than to intracellular processes occurring in the course of cell death. The observed variations in optical and morphological parameters of cells as a function of treatment dose were shown to conform to the specific cell death pathways. The advantages and disadvantages of each technique are discussed.

Institute of Cytology (RU), Ioffe Institute (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Digital Holography and Microscopy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analysis of cellular response to photodynamic treatment using digital holographic microscopy, SLIM, and FLIM — O. S. Vasyutinskiǐ, А.В. Салова, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS