A citação por aplicativos de mensagens (WhatsApp) no processo penal brasileiro e sua compatibilidade com o direito ao contraditório

The article presents a study on the right to service of process as a logical consequence and prerequisite of the right to a fair trial. From this starting point, it seeks to understand whether the loosening of procedural requirements for summons, particularly with the growing use of messaging apps without legal provision, is compatible with the accusatory criminal procedure. A qualitative methodology is employed, based on empirical data, by collecting rulings from Brazilian higher courts (STJ and STF) on the use of WhatsApp for summons to investigate how this issue has been addressed. The following questions are explored: how did the acceptance of the relaxation of summons formalities in the higher courts' jurisprudence develop? Is this compatible with the right to a fair trial? In conclusion, the study found that the increasing loosening of procedural requirements for summons is empirically verifiable in the STJ and STF and has been implemented without the necessary precautions, which is incompatible with the right to a fair trial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v10i3.1013
Primary Topic
Brazilian Legal Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A citação por aplicativos de mensagens (WhatsApp) no processo penal brasileiro e sua compatibilidade com o direito ao contraditório

Alexandra Pinheiro de Castro, Matheus Leão Alves da Silva
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal
Brazilian Legal Issues
article

A citação por aplicativos de mensagens (WhatsApp) no processo penal brasileiro e sua compatibilidade com o direito ao contraditório

Alexandra Pinheiro de Castro, Matheus Leão Alves da Silva
article en

Abstract

The article presents a study on the right to service of process as a logical consequence and prerequisite of the right to a fair trial. From this starting point, it seeks to understand whether the loosening of procedural requirements for summons, particularly with the growing use of messaging apps without legal provision, is compatible with the accusatory criminal procedure. A qualitative methodology is employed, based on empirical data, by collecting rulings from Brazilian higher courts (STJ and STF) on the use of WhatsApp for summons to investigate how this issue has been addressed. The following questions are explored: how did the acceptance of the relaxation of summons formalities in the higher courts' jurisprudence develop? Is this compatible with the right to a fair trial? In conclusion, the study found that the increasing loosening of procedural requirements for summons is empirically verifiable in the STJ and STF and has been implemented without the necessary precautions, which is incompatible with the right to a fair trial.

Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual PenalVol. 10(3)
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (BR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Brazilian Legal Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A citação por aplicativos de mensagens (WhatsApp) no processo penal brasileiro e sua compatibilidade com o direito ao contraditório — Alexandra Pinheiro de Castro, Matheus Leão Alves da Silva · Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS