Is Europe ready for xenotransplantation?

This comment addresses recent advancements in xenotransplantation research, which suggest that new types of transplants could become possible soon. It argues that the ethical concerns surrounding xenotransplantation in humans are particularly complex. These concerns go beyond the traditional medical ethics of informed consent and patient care, or balancing patient risks against benefits. The potential risk of xenosis—diseases transmitted from animals to humans—makes xenotransplantation a broader issue, one that relates to public health. The key question is whether the reduced risks of xenosis can justify the possibility of detrimental consequences, such as a pandemic. It is argued that these concerns should not be limited to expert discussions but should engage the wider public through a broad debate involving all sectors of society. Emerging technologies, such as gene editing, amplify the need for such ethical discussions. Have these new technologies made xenotransplantation safer and more acceptable? Now is the time for public dialogue on this complex issue.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04126-7
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Xenotransplantation and immune response
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Europe ready for xenotransplantation?

Penilla Gunther, Espen Rimstad, Ana Marušić, Matthias Kaiser et al.
1 citations
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Xenotransplantation and immune response
0.57
article

Is Europe ready for xenotransplantation?

Penilla Gunther, Espen Rimstad, Ana Marušić, Matthias Kaiser, Ellen‐Marie Forsberg, Vasiliki Mollaki
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This comment addresses recent advancements in xenotransplantation research, which suggest that new types of transplants could become possible soon. It argues that the ethical concerns surrounding xenotransplantation in humans are particularly complex. These concerns go beyond the traditional medical ethics of informed consent and patient care, or balancing patient risks against benefits. The potential risk of xenosis—diseases transmitted from animals to humans—makes xenotransplantation a broader issue, one that relates to public health. The key question is whether the reduced risks of xenosis can justify the possibility of detrimental consequences, such as a pandemic. It is argued that these concerns should not be limited to expert discussions but should engage the wider public through a broad debate involving all sectors of society. Emerging technologies, such as gene editing, amplify the need for such ethical discussions. Have these new technologies made xenotransplantation safer and more acceptable? Now is the time for public dialogue on this complex issue.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 11(1)
National Centre of Scientific Research "Demokritos" (GR), European CanCer Organisation (BE), Norwegian Institute for Sustainability Research (NO), University of Bergen (NO), Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO), University of Split (HR)
Universitetet i Bergen
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Xenotransplantation and immune response
0.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.