Manufacturing process energy consumption modeling: a methodology to identify the most appropriate model

Abstract This paper investigates the appropriateness of machine learning (ML) and other techniques for modeling manufacturing processes energy consumption by developing a comparison methodology. Three research questions are posed: Firstly, how do prediction errors compare using different techniques with varying complexity and ML use? Secondly, how does performance vary with different amounts of data? Thirdly, how do different techniques compare in terms of required expertise, effort to build and interpretability of results? To answer these questions, the authors develop a structured approach, which is also envisioned to be useable by practicing engineers and manufacturers. Four modeling categories are defined, ranging from simple non-ML methods, such as linear regression, to complex ML methods, such as deep neural networks. The approach is evaluated using data from a compound feed manufacturing process. The results confirm the notion that non-ML models are better suited to understand and model manufacturing processes when few parameters are present, due to their high interpretability, while ML models are recommended for analyzing processes with many potentially relevant and interrelated parameters. Interestingly the approach finds that the complex ML category model does not outperform the simple ML category model in terms of prediction accuracy, and only has the drawback of requiring more expertise to build and having lower interpretability. The study concludes that the decision to use complex ML for modeling manufacturing process energy consumption should be critically questioned and that a simpler approach may be better suited, suggesting that the developed methodology would be of value to practicing engineers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-024-02514-z
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Energy Efficiency and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.10

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Manufacturing process energy consumption modeling: a methodology to identify the most appropriate model

Jan-Hendrik Ohlendorf, Dennis Bode, Henry Ekwaro-Osire, Klaus‐Dieter Thoben
1 citations
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing
Energy Efficiency and Management
0.10
article

Manufacturing process energy consumption modeling: a methodology to identify the most appropriate model

Jan-Hendrik Ohlendorf, Dennis Bode, Henry Ekwaro-Osire, Klaus‐Dieter Thoben
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper investigates the appropriateness of machine learning (ML) and other techniques for modeling manufacturing processes energy consumption by developing a comparison methodology. Three research questions are posed: Firstly, how do prediction errors compare using different techniques with varying complexity and ML use? Secondly, how does performance vary with different amounts of data? Thirdly, how do different techniques compare in terms of required expertise, effort to build and interpretability of results? To answer these questions, the authors develop a structured approach, which is also envisioned to be useable by practicing engineers and manufacturers. Four modeling categories are defined, ranging from simple non-ML methods, such as linear regression, to complex ML methods, such as deep neural networks. The approach is evaluated using data from a compound feed manufacturing process. The results confirm the notion that non-ML models are better suited to understand and model manufacturing processes when few parameters are present, due to their high interpretability, while ML models are recommended for analyzing processes with many potentially relevant and interrelated parameters. Interestingly the approach finds that the complex ML category model does not outperform the simple ML category model in terms of prediction accuracy, and only has the drawback of requiring more expertise to build and having lower interpretability. The study concludes that the decision to use complex ML for modeling manufacturing process energy consumption should be critically questioned and that a simpler approach may be better suited, suggesting that the developed methodology would be of value to practicing engineers.

Journal of Intelligent ManufacturingVol. 36(8)
University of Bremen (DE), Bremer Institut für Produktion und Logistik GmbH
Universität Bremen
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Energy Efficiency and Management
0.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.