The correct name for the subfamily containing Kalanchoe is Crassulaceae subfam. Cotyledonoideae, and not Crassulaceae subfam. Kalanchooideae, with amendment of the circumscription of Crassulaceae subfam. Cotyledonoideae

In 2022, a proposal to reject the subfamily name Crassulaceae subfam. Cotyledonoideae was submitted, through publication, as is required in the currently operative International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants, to the General Committee (GC), and through that body, automatically to the (Permanent) Nomenclature Committee for Vascular Plants (NCVP). Drafting and publication of the rejection proposal was undertaken because, despite having priority, the name Crassulaceae subfam. Cotyledonoideae, has not been used in the taxonomic literature relating to the family for the past 30 years. Rather, virtually all the published studies on the Crassulaceae that referenced subfamilies used Crassulaceae subfam. Kalanchooideae, for which the informal name “Kalanchoe clade” has been used exclusively in phylogenetic studies of the Crassulaceae. However, the NCVP (in February 2024) recommended against the proposal to reject the name Crassulaceae subfam. Cotyledonoideae. This recommendation was submitted to the GC, which supported the NCVP and rejected the rejection proposal (in July 2024), despite an appeal against this outcome having been lodged (in February 2024). The further procedural treatment of the report of the GC is discussed in this paper. The outcome of the proposal having been rejected is that the subfamily name Crassulaceae subfam. Cotyledonoideae must be adopted in the stead of the subfamily name Crassulaceae subfam. Kalanchooideae for a group of four predominantly, but not exclusively, southern African genera, i.e., Adromischus, Cotyledon, Kalanchoe, and Tylecodon. Kalanchoe in particular has a wider natural geographical distribution range. Since the original circumscription of Crassulaceae subfam. Cotyledonoideae included a disparate group of six southern and northern hemisphere genera, a further outcome of the proposal having been rejected is that the circumscription of this subfamily must be amended. This is done here.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Phytotaxa
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.672.3.7
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The correct name for the subfamily containing Kalanchoe is Crassulaceae subfam. Cotyledonoideae, and not Crassulaceae subfam. Kalanchooideae, with amendment of the circumscription of Crassulaceae subfam. Cotyledonoideae

Anna M. Monro, Gideon F. Smith
1 citations
Phytotaxa
Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna
0.60
article

The correct name for the subfamily containing Kalanchoe is Crassulaceae subfam. Cotyledonoideae, and not Crassulaceae subfam. Kalanchooideae, with amendment of the circumscription of Crassulaceae subfam. Cotyledonoideae

Anna M. Monro, Gideon F. Smith
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In 2022, a proposal to reject the subfamily name Crassulaceae subfam. Cotyledonoideae was submitted, through publication, as is required in the currently operative International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants, to the General Committee (GC), and through that body, automatically to the (Permanent) Nomenclature Committee for Vascular Plants (NCVP). Drafting and publication of the rejection proposal was undertaken because, despite having priority, the name Crassulaceae subfam. Cotyledonoideae, has not been used in the taxonomic literature relating to the family for the past 30 years. Rather, virtually all the published studies on the Crassulaceae that referenced subfamilies used Crassulaceae subfam. Kalanchooideae, for which the informal name “Kalanchoe clade” has been used exclusively in phylogenetic studies of the Crassulaceae. However, the NCVP (in February 2024) recommended against the proposal to reject the name Crassulaceae subfam. Cotyledonoideae. This recommendation was submitted to the GC, which supported the NCVP and rejected the rejection proposal (in July 2024), despite an appeal against this outcome having been lodged (in February 2024). The further procedural treatment of the report of the GC is discussed in this paper. The outcome of the proposal having been rejected is that the subfamily name Crassulaceae subfam. Cotyledonoideae must be adopted in the stead of the subfamily name Crassulaceae subfam. Kalanchooideae for a group of four predominantly, but not exclusively, southern African genera, i.e., Adromischus, Cotyledon, Kalanchoe, and Tylecodon. Kalanchoe in particular has a wider natural geographical distribution range. Since the original circumscription of Crassulaceae subfam. Cotyledonoideae included a disparate group of six southern and northern hemisphere genera, a further outcome of the proposal having been rejected is that the circumscription of this subfamily must be amended. This is done here.

PhytotaxaVol. 672(3)
Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Research (AU), Australian National Herbarium (AU), Nelson Mandela University (ZA)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna
0.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.