Beyond boundaries: Depositional environment controls on erodibility, process, and form in rivers incising sedimentary bedrock

Abstract Bedrock rivers adjust to the properties of the rock into which they incise, imprinting the geologic past on Earth's surface. We compared rock properties and channel form along the Dry Fork in the Allegheny Mountains, West Virginia, as it crosses between Mississippian sandstone and carbonate rock units, to investigate how the depositional history of channel-margin bedrock influences modern channel form. We used thin-section petrography to interpret site-specific depositional environments. We quantified rock strength with point-load testing, discontinuity spacing by measuring bed and fracture spacing, and channel form through cross-section surveys. Petrography indicates that the sandstone was likely deposited in an alluvial fan, while the carbonate formed in a shallow-marine environment. The sandstone has modestly higher point-load strength than the carbonate, but the units differ more dramatically in their discontinuity spacing. The sandstone is thinly (3–10 cm) bedded and densely (50–100 cm) fractured; the carbonate has thicker (45 cm) beds and sparser (180–300 cm) fractures. Sandstone channel cross sections are wider, shallower, and rougher, whereas carbonate cross sections are narrower, deeper, and smoother. Results suggest that a transition from plucking-dominated erosion in the discontinuity-rich sandstone to abrasion- and/or dissolution-dominated erosion in the discontinuity-poor carbonate, rather than differences in rock strength, drives observed morphologic differences. Differences in discontinuity spacing might arise from differential bed thickness between the two units, both because bed boundaries are discontinuities and because thinner beds lead to more densely spaced fractures. We hypothesize that depositional dynamics—the unsteady deposition of an alluvial fan resulting in thin beds versus steady, shallow-marine deposition that deposited thicker beds—explain the observed differences in bed thickness, discontinuity spacing, and modern erosion process dominance and channel form, emphasizing how modern Earth-surface processes are contingent on the geologic past.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geosphere
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1130/ges02791.1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geological formations and processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond boundaries: Depositional environment controls on erodibility, process, and form in rivers incising sedimentary bedrock

Kathleen C. Benison, Charles M. Shobe, Nicholas Colaianne, Kristin Chilton et al.
1 citations
Geosphere
Geological formations and processes
0.52
article

Beyond boundaries: Depositional environment controls on erodibility, process, and form in rivers incising sedimentary bedrock

Kathleen C. Benison, Charles M. Shobe, Nicholas Colaianne, Kristin Chilton, Joseph Moler
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Bedrock rivers adjust to the properties of the rock into which they incise, imprinting the geologic past on Earth's surface. We compared rock properties and channel form along the Dry Fork in the Allegheny Mountains, West Virginia, as it crosses between Mississippian sandstone and carbonate rock units, to investigate how the depositional history of channel-margin bedrock influences modern channel form. We used thin-section petrography to interpret site-specific depositional environments. We quantified rock strength with point-load testing, discontinuity spacing by measuring bed and fracture spacing, and channel form through cross-section surveys. Petrography indicates that the sandstone was likely deposited in an alluvial fan, while the carbonate formed in a shallow-marine environment. The sandstone has modestly higher point-load strength than the carbonate, but the units differ more dramatically in their discontinuity spacing. The sandstone is thinly (3–10 cm) bedded and densely (50–100 cm) fractured; the carbonate has thicker (45 cm) beds and sparser (180–300 cm) fractures. Sandstone channel cross sections are wider, shallower, and rougher, whereas carbonate cross sections are narrower, deeper, and smoother. Results suggest that a transition from plucking-dominated erosion in the discontinuity-rich sandstone to abrasion- and/or dissolution-dominated erosion in the discontinuity-poor carbonate, rather than differences in rock strength, drives observed morphologic differences. Differences in discontinuity spacing might arise from differential bed thickness between the two units, both because bed boundaries are discontinuities and because thinner beds lead to more densely spaced fractures. We hypothesize that depositional dynamics—the unsteady deposition of an alluvial fan resulting in thin beds versus steady, shallow-marine deposition that deposited thicker beds—explain the observed differences in bed thickness, discontinuity spacing, and modern erosion process dominance and channel form, emphasizing how modern Earth-surface processes are contingent on the geologic past.

GeosphereVol. 21(1)
West Virginia University (US), US Forest Service (US), University of Idaho (US), Rocky Mountain Research Station (US), Virginia Tech (US)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Geological formations and processes
0.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.