Collocations in Methods Section of Masters of English Language Theses

Collocation has long been recognised as a problematic domain for Second language learners of English and acknowledged to lag far behind the acquisition of other Second language acquisition (SLA) aspects. This mixed approach study was, therefore, aimed to identify content words and their collocations in the methods section of the Master of Philosophy in English Language theses. Specifically, the research question was: What are the collocations of the content word in the Methods sections of English language MPhil theses at the University of Cape Coast, Ghana? The data was purposively sampled from 20 MPhil theses submitted to the Department of English and analysed using AntConc 3.5.8 software. The Firthian (1986) Collocation Approach was used for the study. The findings showed that the content word data is the keyword typical of the methods section, and it strongly collocates with both nouns and verbs to both the left and to the right in varied ways. Also, near-synonyms collocate differently with the keyword data. This study makes a vital contribution by revealing how the students in the Master of Philosophy in English programme make use of language to present the methods section of their theses. The study offers implications for engendering students’ academic writing, especially at the postgraduate level. Received: 18 September 2024 / Accepted: 10 November 2024 / Published: 20 November 2024

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36941/mjss-2024-0057
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Collocations in Methods Section of Masters of English Language Theses

Francis Bukari, Ramos Asafo‐Adjei, Wilhelmina Coker Davi
Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences
Natural Language Processing Techniques
article

Collocations in Methods Section of Masters of English Language Theses

Francis Bukari, Ramos Asafo‐Adjei, Wilhelmina Coker Davi
article en

Abstract

Collocation has long been recognised as a problematic domain for Second language learners of English and acknowledged to lag far behind the acquisition of other Second language acquisition (SLA) aspects. This mixed approach study was, therefore, aimed to identify content words and their collocations in the methods section of the Master of Philosophy in English Language theses. Specifically, the research question was: What are the collocations of the content word in the Methods sections of English language MPhil theses at the University of Cape Coast, Ghana? The data was purposively sampled from 20 MPhil theses submitted to the Department of English and analysed using AntConc 3.5.8 software. The Firthian (1986) Collocation Approach was used for the study. The findings showed that the content word data is the keyword typical of the methods section, and it strongly collocates with both nouns and verbs to both the left and to the right in varied ways. Also, near-synonyms collocate differently with the keyword data. This study makes a vital contribution by revealing how the students in the Master of Philosophy in English programme make use of language to present the methods section of their theses. The study offers implications for engendering students’ academic writing, especially at the postgraduate level. Received: 18 September 2024 / Accepted: 10 November 2024 / Published: 20 November 2024

Mediterranean Journal of Social SciencesVol. 15(6)
Takoradi Technical University (GH)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Collocations in Methods Section of Masters of English Language Theses — Francis Bukari, Ramos Asafo‐Adjei, et al. · Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS