Investigating the relationships of writing behaviours to linguistic complexity and accuracy in independent and integrated writing task performance

Abstract In this study, we examined the extent to which fluency, pausing, and eye-gaze behaviours relate to linguistic complexity and accuracy in L2 independent and integrated writing task performance. Sixty Chinese L2 users of English performed two independent and two integrated TOEFL iBT tasks over two sessions. Their keystrokes and eye movements during task performance were captured. The written outputs were analysed in terms of linguistic complexity and accuracy. Linear mixed effects regression analyses revealed stronger relationships of fluency and pausing behaviours to linguistic complexity and accuracy for independent than integrated writing, while stronger relationships of eye-gaze behaviours to linguistic complexity and accuracy were identified for integrated than independent writing. In addition, we found that greater accuracy in writing was linked to shorter pause duration between words for independent writing and shorter forward saccades for integrated writing, writing behaviours associated with more automated linguistic encoding processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Linguistics Review
Published
2024-11-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2024-0004
Primary Topic
Writing and Handwriting Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the relationships of writing behaviours to linguistic complexity and accuracy in independent and integrated writing task performance

Nektaria‐Efstathia Kourtali, Andrea Révész, Laís Borges, Marije Michel et al.
Applied Linguistics Review
Writing and Handwriting Education
article

Investigating the relationships of writing behaviours to linguistic complexity and accuracy in independent and integrated writing task performance

Nektaria‐Efstathia Kourtali, Andrea Révész, Laís Borges, Marije Michel, Xiaojun Lu, Minjin Lee
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this study, we examined the extent to which fluency, pausing, and eye-gaze behaviours relate to linguistic complexity and accuracy in L2 independent and integrated writing task performance. Sixty Chinese L2 users of English performed two independent and two integrated TOEFL iBT tasks over two sessions. Their keystrokes and eye movements during task performance were captured. The written outputs were analysed in terms of linguistic complexity and accuracy. Linear mixed effects regression analyses revealed stronger relationships of fluency and pausing behaviours to linguistic complexity and accuracy for independent than integrated writing, while stronger relationships of eye-gaze behaviours to linguistic complexity and accuracy were identified for integrated than independent writing. In addition, we found that greater accuracy in writing was linked to shorter pause duration between words for independent writing and shorter forward saccades for integrated writing, writing behaviours associated with more automated linguistic encoding processes.

Applied Linguistics ReviewVol. 16(4)
University of Liverpool (GB), University of Groningen (NL), Yonsei University (KR), Universidade Católica de Brasília (BR), University of Southampton (GB), University College London (GB)
Educational Testing Service
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Writing and Handwriting Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.