Kernel‐Based Bootstrap Synthetic Data to Estimate Measurement Uncertainty in Analytical Sciences

ABSTRACT Measurement uncertainty (MU) is becoming a key figure of merit for analytical methods, and estimating MU from method validation data is cost‐effective and practical. Since MU can be defined as a coverage interval of a given result, the computation of statistical prediction intervals is a possible approach, but the quality of the intervals is questionable when the number of available data is reduced. In this context, the bootstrap procedure constitutes an efficient strategy to increase the observed data variability. While applying naive bootstrap to validation data raises some computational challenges, the use of smooth bootstrap is much more interesting when synthetic data are generated using an adapted kernel density estimation algorithm. MU can be directly obtained in a very convenient way as an uncertainty function applicable to any unknown future measurement. This publication presents the advantages and disadvantages of this new method illustrated using diverse in‐house and interlaboratory validation data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemometrics
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.3628
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kernel‐Based Bootstrap Synthetic Data to Estimate Measurement Uncertainty in Analytical Sciences

Max Feinberg, Serge Rudaz, Stéphan Clémençon, Julien Boccard
1 citations
Journal of Chemometrics
Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
0.71
article

Kernel‐Based Bootstrap Synthetic Data to Estimate Measurement Uncertainty in Analytical Sciences

Max Feinberg, Serge Rudaz, Stéphan Clémençon, Julien Boccard
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Measurement uncertainty (MU) is becoming a key figure of merit for analytical methods, and estimating MU from method validation data is cost‐effective and practical. Since MU can be defined as a coverage interval of a given result, the computation of statistical prediction intervals is a possible approach, but the quality of the intervals is questionable when the number of available data is reduced. In this context, the bootstrap procedure constitutes an efficient strategy to increase the observed data variability. While applying naive bootstrap to validation data raises some computational challenges, the use of smooth bootstrap is much more interesting when synthetic data are generated using an adapted kernel density estimation algorithm. MU can be directly obtained in a very convenient way as an uncertainty function applicable to any unknown future measurement. This publication presents the advantages and disadvantages of this new method illustrated using diverse in‐house and interlaboratory validation data.

Journal of ChemometricsVol. 38(12)
University of Geneva (CH), Télécom Paris (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Kernel‐Based Bootstrap Synthetic Data to Estimate Measurement Uncertainty in Analytical Sciences — Max Feinberg, Serge Rudaz, et al. · Journal of Chemometrics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS