Forest-biased terminology does not help to include open ecosystems in conservation policies

• In all conservation debates, terminology needs to adequately describe the ecosystems in questions. • Using ‘Forest Code’ for Law 12.651, Brazil's Law for Protection of Native Vegetation, is incorrect and should be abandoned. • The term ‘deforestation’ should not be applied to vegetation types other than forest. Inadequate terminology, in particular the use of the term ‘Forest Code’ for the main conservation law and of the term ‘deforestation’ for loss of all types of ecosystems, in the conservation debate in Brazil confuses the public and risks jeopardizing conservation goals. We urge scientists, conservationists and government agencies to use adequate terminology as not to reinforce already existing biases in conservation and to better inform the public about the need to conserve all types of ecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2024.11.001
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Forest Management and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Forest-biased terminology does not help to include open ecosystems in conservation policies

Gerhard Ernst Overbeck, Valério D. Pillar
2 citations
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation
Forest Management and Policy
0.57
article

Forest-biased terminology does not help to include open ecosystems in conservation policies

Gerhard Ernst Overbeck, Valério D. Pillar
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• In all conservation debates, terminology needs to adequately describe the ecosystems in questions. • Using ‘Forest Code’ for Law 12.651, Brazil's Law for Protection of Native Vegetation, is incorrect and should be abandoned. • The term ‘deforestation’ should not be applied to vegetation types other than forest. Inadequate terminology, in particular the use of the term ‘Forest Code’ for the main conservation law and of the term ‘deforestation’ for loss of all types of ecosystems, in the conservation debate in Brazil confuses the public and risks jeopardizing conservation goals. We urge scientists, conservationists and government agencies to use adequate terminology as not to reinforce already existing biases in conservation and to better inform the public about the need to conserve all types of ecosystems.

Perspectives in Ecology and ConservationVol. 22(4)
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Forest Management and Policy
0.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.