Supraorbital and Endonasal Approaches: Tailoring Surgical Techniques for Tuberculum Sellae Meningiomas Based on Preoperative Grading Systems—Minimally Invasive Approaches for Tuberculum Sellae Meningiomas

Tuberculum sellae meningiomas (TSMs) tend to compress the optic apparatus and an ideal surgical route, whether transcranial or endonasal, is still debated. Another issue is if the minimally invasive supraorbital (SO) approach offers the same results compared with the more invasive craniotomies. Aiming to guide approach selection, preoperative grading systems have been described.All cases of TSMs treated from 2013 to 2018 by extended endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) or SO approach have been reviewed and classified according to three preoperative grading systems: McDermott scale, Optic Nerve Laterality Score, and Yaşargil criteria.A total of 15 patients with TSMs were treated with the EEA (<i>n</i> = 6) or the SO (<i>n</i> = 9) approach. Globally, gross total resection was obtained in 87% (<i>n</i> = 13) of cases and was higher with the SO (100%, <i>n</i> = 9) compared with the EEA (67%, <i>n</i> = 4). Visual function improved in all but one patient (<i>n</i> = 14). Compared with the EEA group, patients treated by the SO approach had larger tumors (32.3 mm vs. 24.5 mm), a higher rate of optic canal invasion (4/9 vs. 0/6), and arterial encasement (6/9 vs. 1/5). Patients with McDermott total points of 1 to 2 (7/15) were treated mainly by the EEA; all patients with McDermott total score of ≥3 (8/15) were treated by the SO approach. All patients with optic canal invasion (4/15) and lateral extension of the tumor (ONL score = 1-3) were treated by the SO approach.The SO and EEA are two minimally invasive approaches safe and effective for treating TSMs. For tumors with lateral extension (optic nerve laterality [ONL] score = 1-3), larger diameter (>30-35 mm), vascular encasement, or optic canal involvement (McDermott total point = 2-3), the SO craniotomy is preferred. For small and median tumors with no optic canal invasion or vascular encasement (McDermott total point = 1-2), the EEA represents a valid option.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neurological Surgery Part A Central European Neurosurgery
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2479-4598
Primary Topic
Meningioma and schwannoma management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supraorbital and Endonasal Approaches: Tailoring Surgical Techniques for Tuberculum Sellae Meningiomas Based on Preoperative Grading Systems—Minimally Invasive Approaches for Tuberculum Sellae Meningiomas

Stefano Vecchioni, Daniele Marruzzo, Francesca Barbieri, Riccardo Paracino et al.
Journal of Neurological Surgery Part A Central European Neurosurgery
Meningioma and schwannoma management
article

Supraorbital and Endonasal Approaches: Tailoring Surgical Techniques for Tuberculum Sellae Meningiomas Based on Preoperative Grading Systems—Minimally Invasive Approaches for Tuberculum Sellae Meningiomas

Stefano Vecchioni, Daniele Marruzzo, Francesca Barbieri, Riccardo Paracino, Riccardo Antonio Ricciuti, Fabrizio Mancini, Pierfrancesco De Domenico, Matteo Maria Ottaviani, Carlo Conti, Serena Pagano
article en

Abstract

Tuberculum sellae meningiomas (TSMs) tend to compress the optic apparatus and an ideal surgical route, whether transcranial or endonasal, is still debated. Another issue is if the minimally invasive supraorbital (SO) approach offers the same results compared with the more invasive craniotomies. Aiming to guide approach selection, preoperative grading systems have been described.All cases of TSMs treated from 2013 to 2018 by extended endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) or SO approach have been reviewed and classified according to three preoperative grading systems: McDermott scale, Optic Nerve Laterality Score, and Yaşargil criteria.A total of 15 patients with TSMs were treated with the EEA (<i>n</i> = 6) or the SO (<i>n</i> = 9) approach. Globally, gross total resection was obtained in 87% (<i>n</i> = 13) of cases and was higher with the SO (100%, <i>n</i> = 9) compared with the EEA (67%, <i>n</i> = 4). Visual function improved in all but one patient (<i>n</i> = 14). Compared with the EEA group, patients treated by the SO approach had larger tumors (32.3 mm vs. 24.5 mm), a higher rate of optic canal invasion (4/9 vs. 0/6), and arterial encasement (6/9 vs. 1/5). Patients with McDermott total points of 1 to 2 (7/15) were treated mainly by the EEA; all patients with McDermott total score of ≥3 (8/15) were treated by the SO approach. All patients with optic canal invasion (4/15) and lateral extension of the tumor (ONL score = 1-3) were treated by the SO approach.The SO and EEA are two minimally invasive approaches safe and effective for treating TSMs. For tumors with lateral extension (optic nerve laterality [ONL] score = 1-3), larger diameter (>30-35 mm), vascular encasement, or optic canal involvement (McDermott total point = 2-3), the SO craniotomy is preferred. For small and median tumors with no optic canal invasion or vascular encasement (McDermott total point = 1-2), the EEA represents a valid option.

Journal of Neurological Surgery Part A Central European NeurosurgeryVol. 87(02)
Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini (IT), Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona (IT), Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti (IT), Ospedale Santa Maria (IT), Ospedale di Belcolle (IT), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT), Carlo Forlanini Hospital (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I (IT), Misericordia University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Meningioma and schwannoma management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.