Clinical Outcomes of Revision Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Late Deterioration after Laminotomy Assessed with the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.There have been a few studies comparing surgical outcomes between revision lumbar fusion surgery and the same primary surgery.Using the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ), we compared clinical outcomes of revision posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) for late deterioration after laminotomy with those of primary PLIF to examine whether surgical outcomes of revision PLIF for late deterioration after laminotomy are inferior to those of primary PLIF.Sixteen consecutive patients undergoing revision single-level PLIF for late deterioration after single-level laminotomy (R group) and 61 consecutive patients undergoing primary single-level PLIF during the same period (P group) were enrolled. Before PLIF surgery and at 2 years postoperatively, clinical outcomes were assessed using the ZCQ. Achievement rates of the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of each domain (Symptom severity [SS] and Physical function [PF]) on the ZCQ were calculated in each group.In the R group, mean SS and PF before revision PLIF and at 2 years after surgery were 3.429 and 2.8, and 1.946 and 1.6, respectively. In the P group, mean SS and PF before primary PLIF and at postoperative 2 years were 3.438 and 2.5, and 2.194 and 1.6, respectively. Both SS and PF significantly improved at postoperative 2 years in both groups, and SS both before and after PLIF and PF at 2 years postoperatively showed no significant differences between the two groups. Achievement rates of the MCID of SS and PF were 81.3 and 68.8% in the R group, and 59.0 and 59.0% in the P group, respectively. None of the MCID achievement rates of SS and PF showed significant differences between the two groups.Clinical outcomes of revision PLIF for late deterioration after laminotomy were equivalent to those of primary PLIF assessed with the ZCQ at 2 years after PLIF surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neurological Surgery Part A Central European Neurosurgery
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2479-4972
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Outcomes of Revision Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Late Deterioration after Laminotomy Assessed with the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire

Takahito Fujimori, Tsuyoshi Sugiura, Daisuke Ikegami, Hironobu Sakaura et al.
Journal of Neurological Surgery Part A Central European Neurosurgery
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Clinical Outcomes of Revision Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Late Deterioration after Laminotomy Assessed with the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire

Takahito Fujimori, Tsuyoshi Sugiura, Daisuke Ikegami, Hironobu Sakaura, Shutaro Yamada, S Kanayama
article en

Abstract

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.There have been a few studies comparing surgical outcomes between revision lumbar fusion surgery and the same primary surgery.Using the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ), we compared clinical outcomes of revision posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) for late deterioration after laminotomy with those of primary PLIF to examine whether surgical outcomes of revision PLIF for late deterioration after laminotomy are inferior to those of primary PLIF.Sixteen consecutive patients undergoing revision single-level PLIF for late deterioration after single-level laminotomy (R group) and 61 consecutive patients undergoing primary single-level PLIF during the same period (P group) were enrolled. Before PLIF surgery and at 2 years postoperatively, clinical outcomes were assessed using the ZCQ. Achievement rates of the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of each domain (Symptom severity [SS] and Physical function [PF]) on the ZCQ were calculated in each group.In the R group, mean SS and PF before revision PLIF and at 2 years after surgery were 3.429 and 2.8, and 1.946 and 1.6, respectively. In the P group, mean SS and PF before primary PLIF and at postoperative 2 years were 3.438 and 2.5, and 2.194 and 1.6, respectively. Both SS and PF significantly improved at postoperative 2 years in both groups, and SS both before and after PLIF and PF at 2 years postoperatively showed no significant differences between the two groups. Achievement rates of the MCID of SS and PF were 81.3 and 68.8% in the R group, and 59.0 and 59.0% in the P group, respectively. None of the MCID achievement rates of SS and PF showed significant differences between the two groups.Clinical outcomes of revision PLIF for late deterioration after laminotomy were equivalent to those of primary PLIF assessed with the ZCQ at 2 years after PLIF surgery.

Journal of Neurological Surgery Part A Central European NeurosurgeryVol. 86(6)
Sumitomo Hospital (JP), Suita Municipal Hospital (JP), Osaka Hospital (JP), Japan Community Healthcare Organization (JP), The University of Osaka (JP)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.