Node Selection Methods Among Distributed Devices for Wireless Consensus

As numerous services and applications are developed within wireless networks, a significant number of wireless devices in future 6G networks are expected to communicate and exchange data with one another to collaboratively make reliable decisions based on the data collected in distributed environments. To address security issues in these environments, blockchain technology has been introduced to ensure data integrity and consistency. Furthermore, to overcome the low performance and scalability challenges associated with blockchain, research has actively focused on wireless consensus and node selection to facilitate fast and reliable decision-making among wireless devices. However, the methods for designating participating nodes in wireless consensus have not been thoroughly analyzed, resulting in performance degradation during the consensus process. Therefore, in this paper, we analyze the consensus failure probability (CFP) and the total communication trials (TCT) for varying numbers of selected nodes using different node selection methods in wireless consensus, specifically reliability-based node selection and average successful transmission probability (STP)-based node selection. We then explore strategies to reduce both the CFP and TCT in wireless consensus.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Computer and Communication
Published
2024-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26855/acc.2024.10.001
Primary Topic
Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Node Selection Methods Among Distributed Devices for Wireless Consensus

Jaeuk Kwon, Iris Chu, Sungho Lee
Advances in Computer and Communication
Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
article

Node Selection Methods Among Distributed Devices for Wireless Consensus

Jaeuk Kwon, Iris Chu, Sungho Lee
article en

Abstract

As numerous services and applications are developed within wireless networks, a significant number of wireless devices in future 6G networks are expected to communicate and exchange data with one another to collaboratively make reliable decisions based on the data collected in distributed environments. To address security issues in these environments, blockchain technology has been introduced to ensure data integrity and consistency. Furthermore, to overcome the low performance and scalability challenges associated with blockchain, research has actively focused on wireless consensus and node selection to facilitate fast and reliable decision-making among wireless devices. However, the methods for designating participating nodes in wireless consensus have not been thoroughly analyzed, resulting in performance degradation during the consensus process. Therefore, in this paper, we analyze the consensus failure probability (CFP) and the total communication trials (TCT) for varying numbers of selected nodes using different node selection methods in wireless consensus, specifically reliability-based node selection and average successful transmission probability (STP)-based node selection. We then explore strategies to reduce both the CFP and TCT in wireless consensus.

Advances in Computer and CommunicationVol. 5(4)
National Research Foundation, National Research Foundation of Korea
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Node Selection Methods Among Distributed Devices for Wireless Consensus — Jaeuk Kwon, Iris Chu, et al. · Advances in Computer and Communication (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS