Automatically Prepared? How Frontline Workers Cope in the Face of Automation

ABSTRACT Public sector digitalisation is often described as a help to frontline workers, who must deal with a high workload, too few resources, and complex professional dilemmas. Digitalisation nevertheless, also creates new challenges that become intertwined with the already existing challenges in street‐level bureaucracies. Based on 25 interviews and more than 80 h of observations conducted in the Danish employment services, this study examines how frontline workers make using automatically generated representations of the clients manageable and meaningful. Drawing on coping theory and abductive analysis three distinct digital coping strategies are identified: automatic (simplification); extended (complication); and in situ (flexibility) preparation. The contribution of the study is twofold. First, it expands the current understanding of coping strategies as simplifying or complicating the work of frontline workers with a third flexibility strategy. This strategy shows how frontline workers cope by minimizing time spent on preparation and instead flexibly search out information during meetings with clients, relying on their skills to lithely manoeuvre in both digital and bureaucratic systems. Second, it provides insight into understanding how digital efficiency initiatives in the public sector often end up playing a different role than intended. Finally, I compare and discuss the consequences of these ambiguous digital coping strategies and point to future avenues of research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Policy and Administration
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.13105
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Labor Movements and Unions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automatically Prepared? How Frontline Workers Cope in the Face of Automation

Louise Jørring
4 citations
Social Policy and Administration
Labor Movements and Unions
3.42
article

Automatically Prepared? How Frontline Workers Cope in the Face of Automation

Louise Jørring
article en
4 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Public sector digitalisation is often described as a help to frontline workers, who must deal with a high workload, too few resources, and complex professional dilemmas. Digitalisation nevertheless, also creates new challenges that become intertwined with the already existing challenges in street‐level bureaucracies. Based on 25 interviews and more than 80 h of observations conducted in the Danish employment services, this study examines how frontline workers make using automatically generated representations of the clients manageable and meaningful. Drawing on coping theory and abductive analysis three distinct digital coping strategies are identified: automatic (simplification); extended (complication); and in situ (flexibility) preparation. The contribution of the study is twofold. First, it expands the current understanding of coping strategies as simplifying or complicating the work of frontline workers with a third flexibility strategy. This strategy shows how frontline workers cope by minimizing time spent on preparation and instead flexibly search out information during meetings with clients, relying on their skills to lithely manoeuvre in both digital and bureaucratic systems. Second, it provides insight into understanding how digital efficiency initiatives in the public sector often end up playing a different role than intended. Finally, I compare and discuss the consequences of these ambiguous digital coping strategies and point to future avenues of research.

Social Policy and AdministrationVol. 59(5)
Copenhagen Business School (DK)
Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Labor Movements and Unions
3.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.