Enhancing capacities for sustainability transition policy design: Lessons from French pesticide reduction plans

Reducing pesticide use has become an important policy objective in several countries, yet many have failed to reach their goals. Policies need to be more systemic to address lock-ins hindering pesticide reduction. To do so, policymakers must improve policymaking processes, while ensuring active stakeholder participation. This requires specific policy capacities, which have not yet been characterized. This article aims to identify policy capacities needed to improve the collective elaboration of pesticide reduction policies and integrate a systemic approach. We studied the collective elaboration of the French pesticide reduction plans. We built a narration of the policy process organized by policymakers, based on semi-structured interviews and an analysis of grey literature. We then reflected on which policy capacities policymakers needed to better manage the policy design process, using the “management situation” concept. Our results show that to better design pesticide reduction policies, policymakers lacked four types of interdependent “policy capacities”: capacities to support collective sensemaking about lock-ins, to co-design interdependent and multi-level instruments, to co-design suitable implementation structures and to ensure learning. These results highlight an issue of dynamic capabilities in public organizations. Our results provide concrete proposals to improve design processes for pesticide reduction policies aiming at systemic transformations: there is a need to develop new methods, tools, analytical resources and training programs for policymakers, to support the development of the policy capacities identified. These results also suggest avenues for future action-research between public management, systemic agronomy, sustainability and design sciences. • Reducing pesticide use is an important policy goal in many countries. • Pesticide reduction policies need to be systemic to overcome lock-ins. • We aimed to identify policy capacities needed to improve pesticide policies design. • We show that French policymakers lacked four types of policy capacities. • These are needed for sense-making, instrument design, implementation and learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Systems
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104175
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.90

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing capacities for sustainability transition policy design: Lessons from French pesticide reduction plans

Viviane Trèves, Mourad Hannachi, Jean-Marc Meynard
7 citations
Agricultural Systems
Climate Change Policy and Economics
7.90
article

Enhancing capacities for sustainability transition policy design: Lessons from French pesticide reduction plans

Viviane Trèves, Mourad Hannachi, Jean-Marc Meynard
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Reducing pesticide use has become an important policy objective in several countries, yet many have failed to reach their goals. Policies need to be more systemic to address lock-ins hindering pesticide reduction. To do so, policymakers must improve policymaking processes, while ensuring active stakeholder participation. This requires specific policy capacities, which have not yet been characterized. This article aims to identify policy capacities needed to improve the collective elaboration of pesticide reduction policies and integrate a systemic approach. We studied the collective elaboration of the French pesticide reduction plans. We built a narration of the policy process organized by policymakers, based on semi-structured interviews and an analysis of grey literature. We then reflected on which policy capacities policymakers needed to better manage the policy design process, using the “management situation” concept. Our results show that to better design pesticide reduction policies, policymakers lacked four types of interdependent “policy capacities”: capacities to support collective sensemaking about lock-ins, to co-design interdependent and multi-level instruments, to co-design suitable implementation structures and to ensure learning. These results highlight an issue of dynamic capabilities in public organizations. Our results provide concrete proposals to improve design processes for pesticide reduction policies aiming at systemic transformations: there is a need to develop new methods, tools, analytical resources and training programs for policymakers, to support the development of the policy capacities identified. These results also suggest avenues for future action-research between public management, systemic agronomy, sustainability and design sciences. • Reducing pesticide use is an important policy goal in many countries. • Pesticide reduction policies need to be systemic to overcome lock-ins. • We aimed to identify policy capacities needed to improve pesticide policies design. • We show that French policymakers lacked four types of policy capacities. • These are needed for sense-making, instrument design, implementation and learning.

Agricultural SystemsVol. 223
AgroParisTech (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Département sciences pour l'action, les transitions, les territoires (FR), Sciences pour l’action et le développement - Activités, produits, territoires (FR)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Ministère de l'Agriculture et de l'Alimentation
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
7.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.