Do emotional carryover effects carry over?

Existing research has demonstrated carryover effects whereby emotions generated in one context influence decisions in other, unrelated ones. We examine the carryover effect in relation to valuations of risky and ambiguous lotteries with a novel focus on the comparison of carryovers arising from a targeted stimulus (designed to elicit a specific emotion) with those arising from a naturalistic stimulus (designed to produce a more complex emotional response). We find carryover effects using both types of stimuli, but they are stronger for the naturalistic stimulus and in the context of ambiguity, providing a proof of concept that carryover effects can be observed when moving away from highly stylised settings. These effects are also gender specific with only males being susceptible. To probe the emotional foundations of the carryover effect, we conduct analysis relating individual self-reports of emotions to valuation behaviour. Our results cast doubt on some previously claimed links between specific incidental emotions and risk taking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2024.102312
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Emotions and Moral Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.93

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do emotional carryover effects carry over?

Chris Starmer, Nikhil Masters, T A Lloyd
3 citations
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics
Emotions and Moral Behavior
1.93
article

Do emotional carryover effects carry over?

Chris Starmer, Nikhil Masters, T A Lloyd
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Existing research has demonstrated carryover effects whereby emotions generated in one context influence decisions in other, unrelated ones. We examine the carryover effect in relation to valuations of risky and ambiguous lotteries with a novel focus on the comparison of carryovers arising from a targeted stimulus (designed to elicit a specific emotion) with those arising from a naturalistic stimulus (designed to produce a more complex emotional response). We find carryover effects using both types of stimuli, but they are stronger for the naturalistic stimulus and in the context of ambiguity, providing a proof of concept that carryover effects can be observed when moving away from highly stylised settings. These effects are also gender specific with only males being susceptible. To probe the emotional foundations of the carryover effect, we conduct analysis relating individual self-reports of emotions to valuation behaviour. Our results cast doubt on some previously claimed links between specific incidental emotions and risk taking.

Journal of Behavioral and Experimental EconomicsVol. 114
University of Essex (GB), University of Nottingham (GB), Bournemouth University (GB)
National Geographic Society, Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Emotions and Moral Behavior
1.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do emotional carryover effects carry over? — Chris Starmer, Nikhil Masters, et al. · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS