The Politics of Method: Arendt and Foucault on Hobbes

Abstract In The Origins of Totalitarianism (1951) and the “ Society Must Be Defended ” lectures (1975–1976), Hannah Arendt and Michel Foucault present unexpected engagements with Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan . This article contextualizes and elucidates their interpretations of Hobbes by foregrounding the genealogical aspect of their projects. Their readings of Leviathan reflect common methodological commitments and figure the distinct but related problematics which Foucault and Arendt articulate, encapsulating the differences between their influential conceptions of power. The article concludes with a reading of Hobbes’ theory of the liberty of subjects, which, while not explicitly addressed by Arendt or Foucault, lends support to their treatments of his text. Comparing their readings of Hobbes opens a potentially generative dialogue between their critiques of sovereignty and racialized state violence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Philosophy of History
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/18722636-12341540
Primary Topic
Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Politics of Method: Arendt and Foucault on Hobbes

Dawn Herrera Helphand
Journal of the Philosophy of History
Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy
article

The Politics of Method: Arendt and Foucault on Hobbes

Dawn Herrera Helphand
article en

Abstract

Abstract In The Origins of Totalitarianism (1951) and the “ Society Must Be Defended ” lectures (1975–1976), Hannah Arendt and Michel Foucault present unexpected engagements with Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan . This article contextualizes and elucidates their interpretations of Hobbes by foregrounding the genealogical aspect of their projects. Their readings of Leviathan reflect common methodological commitments and figure the distinct but related problematics which Foucault and Arendt articulate, encapsulating the differences between their influential conceptions of power. The article concludes with a reading of Hobbes’ theory of the liberty of subjects, which, while not explicitly addressed by Arendt or Foucault, lends support to their treatments of his text. Comparing their readings of Hobbes opens a potentially generative dialogue between their critiques of sovereignty and racialized state violence.

Journal of the Philosophy of HistoryVol. 18(3)
Loyola University Chicago (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Politics of Method: Arendt and Foucault on Hobbes — Dawn Herrera Helphand · Journal of the Philosophy of History (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS