Children's evaluations of interracial peer inclusion and exclusion: The role of intimacy

The present study investigated how Black and White American children, ages 6 to 9.5 years and 9.5 to 12 years (N = 219, M<sub>Age</sub> = 9.18 years, SD<sub>Age</sub> = 1.90; 51% female) evaluated vignettes in which peers included a same- or cross-race peer in a high-intimacy or low-intimacy context. These data were collected from 2021 to 2022. Children expected characters to be less likely to include cross-race peers in high- than low-intimacy contexts. They also evaluated cross-race exclusion more negatively in high- and low-intimacy contexts. Black participants evaluated cross-race exclusion more negatively than did White participants. Older participants were more likely to personally include a cross-race peer. This study is a first step toward understanding the role of intimacy in cross-race peer relationships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Child Development
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.14197
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Children's evaluations of interracial peer inclusion and exclusion: The role of intimacy

Elise M. Kaufman, Katherine Luken Raz, Melanie Killen
2 citations
Child Development
Social and Intergroup Psychology
2.26
article

Children's evaluations of interracial peer inclusion and exclusion: The role of intimacy

Elise M. Kaufman, Katherine Luken Raz, Melanie Killen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The present study investigated how Black and White American children, ages 6 to 9.5 years and 9.5 to 12 years (N = 219, M<sub>Age</sub> = 9.18 years, SD<sub>Age</sub> = 1.90; 51% female) evaluated vignettes in which peers included a same- or cross-race peer in a high-intimacy or low-intimacy context. These data were collected from 2021 to 2022. Children expected characters to be less likely to include cross-race peers in high- than low-intimacy contexts. They also evaluated cross-race exclusion more negatively in high- and low-intimacy contexts. Black participants evaluated cross-race exclusion more negatively than did White participants. Older participants were more likely to personally include a cross-race peer. This study is a first step toward understanding the role of intimacy in cross-race peer relationships.

Child DevelopmentVol. 96(2)
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.