Assessment of whole-site methane emissions from anaerobic digestion plants: Towards establishing emission factors for various plant configurations

This study examines methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emission factors from biogas and wastewater treatment plants, based on primary and secondary data collected from 109 facilities. Primary emission data were measured at 19 facilities representing prevalent plant configurations across Europe. Statistical analysis highlights two categorical variables, namely primary feedstock and plant size, expressed as CH<sub>4</sub> production (≤250 kgh<sup>-1</sup>: small and medium-sized plants, >250 kgh<sup>-1</sup>: large plants), each of which has a significant impact on whole-site CH<sub>4</sub> emissions. Additionally, digestate storage (gastight vs. not-gastight) has a meaningful effect when considering CH<sub>4</sub> production as a continuous variable in the statistical analysis. Our results indicate that wastewater treatment plants have the highest average CH<sub>4</sub> losses (7.0 % of CH<sub>4</sub> produced, n = 31 or 0.10 kgpopulation equivalent(PE)<sup>-1</sup>yr<sup>-1</sup>, n = 28), followed by manure-based plants (3.7 %, n = 49), biowaste treatment facilities (2.8 %, n = 11) and energy crop-processing plants (1.9 %, n = 14). Furthermore, small and medium-sized plants have elevated emissions (5.6 %, n = 67) compared to larger counterparts (2.2 %, n = 42), primarily attributed to the absence of gastight digestate storage. Emissions tend to be lower with gastight digestate storage (2.7 %, n = 61) than not-gastight storage options (6.2 %, n = 48). Emission factors were determined for normal operating conditions, with a further investigation into other-than-normal operating conditions revealing temporal or constant emission peaks in eight out of 19 facilities. These peaks, suggesting potential areas for targeted mitigation strategies, were attributed to pressure relief valves, flare ignition problems and major leakages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Waste Management
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2024.11.021
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.41

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of whole-site methane emissions from anaerobic digestion plants: Towards establishing emission factors for various plant configurations

Marion Huber-Humer, Marlies Hrad, Bernhard Spangl, Thomas Küpper et al.
5 citations
Waste Management
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
1.41
article

Assessment of whole-site methane emissions from anaerobic digestion plants: Towards establishing emission factors for various plant configurations

Marion Huber-Humer, Marlies Hrad, Bernhard Spangl, Thomas Küpper, Charlotte Scheutz, Anders Michael Fredenslund, Viktoria Wechselberger, Marcel Bühler
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This study examines methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emission factors from biogas and wastewater treatment plants, based on primary and secondary data collected from 109 facilities. Primary emission data were measured at 19 facilities representing prevalent plant configurations across Europe. Statistical analysis highlights two categorical variables, namely primary feedstock and plant size, expressed as CH<sub>4</sub> production (≤250 kgh<sup>-1</sup>: small and medium-sized plants, >250 kgh<sup>-1</sup>: large plants), each of which has a significant impact on whole-site CH<sub>4</sub> emissions. Additionally, digestate storage (gastight vs. not-gastight) has a meaningful effect when considering CH<sub>4</sub> production as a continuous variable in the statistical analysis. Our results indicate that wastewater treatment plants have the highest average CH<sub>4</sub> losses (7.0 % of CH<sub>4</sub> produced, n = 31 or 0.10 kgpopulation equivalent(PE)<sup>-1</sup>yr<sup>-1</sup>, n = 28), followed by manure-based plants (3.7 %, n = 49), biowaste treatment facilities (2.8 %, n = 11) and energy crop-processing plants (1.9 %, n = 14). Furthermore, small and medium-sized plants have elevated emissions (5.6 %, n = 67) compared to larger counterparts (2.2 %, n = 42), primarily attributed to the absence of gastight digestate storage. Emissions tend to be lower with gastight digestate storage (2.7 %, n = 61) than not-gastight storage options (6.2 %, n = 48). Emission factors were determined for normal operating conditions, with a further investigation into other-than-normal operating conditions revealing temporal or constant emission peaks in eight out of 19 facilities. These peaks, suggesting potential areas for targeted mitigation strategies, were attributed to pressure relief valves, flare ignition problems and major leakages.

Waste ManagementVol. 191
Aarhus University (DK), Swiss Federal University for Vocational Education and Training SFUVET (CH), BOKU University (AT), Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Bundesministerium für Klimaschutz, Umwelt, Energie, Mobilität, Innovation und Technologie, Energimyndigheten, Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
1.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.