Relative Strength, Rate of Force Development, and Body Mass Ratios Correlate to Dynamic Sports Performance in Youth Athletes

Recreational youth athletes (n = 50) ages (14.58 years ± 3.1) were assessed to evaluate relationships between isometric strength, isometric rate of force development, total body mass and dynamic sports performance assessments. Athletes performed isometric mid-thigh pull, counter-movement jump, drop jump, 20 meter sprint with a 10m split gate as well as the 5-10-5 agility shuttle. Relative Strength Ratios (RSR), Relative Rate of Force Development ratios (RRFD) and isometric rate of force to Max Force Ratios (RFM) were developed and compared to each of the dynamic performance assessments. K-means clustering analysis to create 3 groups for RSR RRFD and RFM were found to correlate to dynamic sports assessments. RSR was found to show moderate correlations, both positive and negative, with dynamic sports assessments. The results show moderate to strong correlations, both positive and negative, with dynamic sports assessments in all but 2 assessments for RRFD. RFM results had very weak, nonsignificant results. Results of ANOVA of each of the ratios to performance outcome measures were found to be significant with small effect sizes. The primary finding of this investigation suggests youth athletes with RSRhigh (2.0+) and RRFDhigh (1.5+) with RFMlow (0.79) performed better than all other youth athletes. Utilizing RSR alone, youth athletes with RSRhigh (2.0+) performed better than all other athletes. The secondary finding of this investigation suggests that thresholds do exist for RSR, RRFD and RFM when compared to dynamic sports assessments which could be used for intake assessments and age-appropriate program design for youth athletes. Assessing youth athletes via relative strength ratios considering isometric force production and total body mass with respect to lean body mass and percent body fat may provide additional insight into training programming and body composition modifications to increase dynamic sports performance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of muscle health.
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47739/musclehealth.1015
Primary Topic
Sports and Physical Education Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relative Strength, Rate of Force Development, and Body Mass Ratios Correlate to Dynamic Sports Performance in Youth Athletes

Greg Lutton, Gordon Muir Giles
Journal of muscle health.
Sports and Physical Education Research
article

Relative Strength, Rate of Force Development, and Body Mass Ratios Correlate to Dynamic Sports Performance in Youth Athletes

Greg Lutton, Gordon Muir Giles
article en

Abstract

Recreational youth athletes (n = 50) ages (14.58 years ± 3.1) were assessed to evaluate relationships between isometric strength, isometric rate of force development, total body mass and dynamic sports performance assessments. Athletes performed isometric mid-thigh pull, counter-movement jump, drop jump, 20 meter sprint with a 10m split gate as well as the 5-10-5 agility shuttle. Relative Strength Ratios (RSR), Relative Rate of Force Development ratios (RRFD) and isometric rate of force to Max Force Ratios (RFM) were developed and compared to each of the dynamic performance assessments. K-means clustering analysis to create 3 groups for RSR RRFD and RFM were found to correlate to dynamic sports assessments. RSR was found to show moderate correlations, both positive and negative, with dynamic sports assessments. The results show moderate to strong correlations, both positive and negative, with dynamic sports assessments in all but 2 assessments for RRFD. RFM results had very weak, nonsignificant results. Results of ANOVA of each of the ratios to performance outcome measures were found to be significant with small effect sizes. The primary finding of this investigation suggests youth athletes with RSRhigh (2.0+) and RRFDhigh (1.5+) with RFMlow (0.79) performed better than all other youth athletes. Utilizing RSR alone, youth athletes with RSRhigh (2.0+) performed better than all other athletes. The secondary finding of this investigation suggests that thresholds do exist for RSR, RRFD and RFM when compared to dynamic sports assessments which could be used for intake assessments and age-appropriate program design for youth athletes. Assessing youth athletes via relative strength ratios considering isometric force production and total body mass with respect to lean body mass and percent body fat may provide additional insight into training programming and body composition modifications to increase dynamic sports performance.

Journal of muscle health.Vol. 6(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Sports and Physical Education Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Relative Strength, Rate of Force Development, and Body Mass Ratios Correlate to Dynamic Sports Performance in Youth Athletes — Greg Lutton, Gordon Muir Giles · Journal of muscle health. (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS