Examining How Structural Conditions, Cultural Norms, and Institutional Practices Shape Diagnostic Delays for Women in Ontario: A Critical Qualitative Study

There are a number of diseases and conditions that have notoriously long diagnostic periods. Often associated with a downplaying or dismissal of symptoms and feelings of shame, many of these diseases and conditions disproportionately manifest among women. Endometriosis, for instance, takes on average three to ten years to diagnose, and cardiovascular disease, ADHD, and pain conditions such as fibromyalgia and rheumatoid arthritis represent other common examples. During a diagnostic delay – when the period becomes prolonged between seeking care until the point at which a diagnosis is made – women continue to suffer from symptoms, lose confidence in healthcare providers and systems, and experience interruptions to their lives, relationships, and sense of self. While several investigations have produced descriptive accounts of these reasons, they leave unaddressed women’s embodied experiences of diagnostic delays, socio-political structures and power relations, such as gender, and the interrelationships between these two components. To address this gap, I will draw on critical phenomenology to ask: How are diagnostic delays lived as embodied social practices by women?; What do narratives of diagnostic delay reveal about gendered embodiment during illness? and In what ways do women’s embodied experiences of illness resist, reinforce, and revise the cultural expectations and institutional practices that contribute to diagnostic delays?. In doing so, my research aims to understand how socio-political structures and power relations are intertwined with embodied experiences of diagnostic delay, and the ways the relationship between them serves to support and/or disrupt this phenomenon. Critical phenomenology engages with a wide range of critical disciplines to understand rich subjective experiences and how normalizing structures privilege some experiences and marginalize others. Drawing on this methodology, I will interview women with lived experience of diagnostic delay and clinicians who have experienced delays in diagnosing women. I will also review relevant practice guidelines and organizational policies to further contextualize this phenomenon. By exploring the intertwined nature of women’s embodied experiences of illness with social structures, and how these relationships serve to impact diagnostic delays for women, this project will importantly address the lack of specific and critical discourse on this phenomenon. In doing so, it will not only advance scholarship in this area, but will also support the continued discussion and advocacy that is essential to effecting change to this enduring and wicked problem.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
University of Toronto Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33137/utjph.v5i1.44246
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Disability Rights and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining How Structural Conditions, Cultural Norms, and Institutional Practices Shape Diagnostic Delays for Women in Ontario: A Critical Qualitative Study

Kelly Gregory, Pia Kontos
1 citations
University of Toronto Journal of Public Health
Disability Rights and Representation
0.53
article

Examining How Structural Conditions, Cultural Norms, and Institutional Practices Shape Diagnostic Delays for Women in Ontario: A Critical Qualitative Study

Kelly Gregory, Pia Kontos
article en
1 citations

Abstract

There are a number of diseases and conditions that have notoriously long diagnostic periods. Often associated with a downplaying or dismissal of symptoms and feelings of shame, many of these diseases and conditions disproportionately manifest among women. Endometriosis, for instance, takes on average three to ten years to diagnose, and cardiovascular disease, ADHD, and pain conditions such as fibromyalgia and rheumatoid arthritis represent other common examples. During a diagnostic delay – when the period becomes prolonged between seeking care until the point at which a diagnosis is made – women continue to suffer from symptoms, lose confidence in healthcare providers and systems, and experience interruptions to their lives, relationships, and sense of self. While several investigations have produced descriptive accounts of these reasons, they leave unaddressed women’s embodied experiences of diagnostic delays, socio-political structures and power relations, such as gender, and the interrelationships between these two components. To address this gap, I will draw on critical phenomenology to ask: How are diagnostic delays lived as embodied social practices by women?; What do narratives of diagnostic delay reveal about gendered embodiment during illness? and In what ways do women’s embodied experiences of illness resist, reinforce, and revise the cultural expectations and institutional practices that contribute to diagnostic delays?. In doing so, my research aims to understand how socio-political structures and power relations are intertwined with embodied experiences of diagnostic delay, and the ways the relationship between them serves to support and/or disrupt this phenomenon. Critical phenomenology engages with a wide range of critical disciplines to understand rich subjective experiences and how normalizing structures privilege some experiences and marginalize others. Drawing on this methodology, I will interview women with lived experience of diagnostic delay and clinicians who have experienced delays in diagnosing women. I will also review relevant practice guidelines and organizational policies to further contextualize this phenomenon. By exploring the intertwined nature of women’s embodied experiences of illness with social structures, and how these relationships serve to impact diagnostic delays for women, this project will importantly address the lack of specific and critical discourse on this phenomenon. In doing so, it will not only advance scholarship in this area, but will also support the continued discussion and advocacy that is essential to effecting change to this enduring and wicked problem.

University of Toronto Journal of Public HealthVol. 5(1)
University Health Network (CA)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Disability Rights and Representation
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.