Scaffolded versus Self-Paced Training for Human-Agent Teams
Two pilot studies compare the impacts of scaffolded versus self-paced practice on teaming and performance on an open-ended design challenge. In both studies, guiding players early on in how to leverage AI assistance (scaffolded practice) led to much more robust teaming than allowing players to learn at their own pace, but did not improve task performance.
Authors
- Leon Lange (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6215-6815)
- Erik Harpstead (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3019-3627)
- Ying Choon Wu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9382-8805)
- Jacob Yenney (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7008-0694)
- Qiao Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5223-9473)
Institutions
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2024-11-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1145/3687272.3690873
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.35