Assessing Psychological Explanations for Jesus’ Post-Resurrection Appearances

Abstract In a recent article published in this journal, Stephen Smith acknowledges that bereavement hallucination is an unlikely explanation for Jesus’ post-resurrection appearances, and suggests supplementing it with theories concerning collective delusion, distorted memory, and cognitive dissonance. Our response contributes to the discussion by bringing our expertise in psychology and New Testament studies together to advance interdisciplinary study on this important topic. We show that Smith’s discussion confounds real-life cases and laboratory experiments on memory, and mass psychogenic illness with illusions. Moreover, Smith fails to consider a number of important differences between the case concerning Jesus’ post-resurrection appearances and cases of cognitive dissonance and other psychological theories, which indicate that these theories are not plausible explanations concerning Jesus’ post-resurrection appearances.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/17455197-bja10044
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Psychological Explanations for Jesus’ Post-Resurrection Appearances

Nick Meader, Andrew Ter Ern Loke
1 citations
Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
0.53
article

Assessing Psychological Explanations for Jesus’ Post-Resurrection Appearances

Nick Meader, Andrew Ter Ern Loke
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In a recent article published in this journal, Stephen Smith acknowledges that bereavement hallucination is an unlikely explanation for Jesus’ post-resurrection appearances, and suggests supplementing it with theories concerning collective delusion, distorted memory, and cognitive dissonance. Our response contributes to the discussion by bringing our expertise in psychology and New Testament studies together to advance interdisciplinary study on this important topic. We show that Smith’s discussion confounds real-life cases and laboratory experiments on memory, and mass psychogenic illness with illusions. Moreover, Smith fails to consider a number of important differences between the case concerning Jesus’ post-resurrection appearances and cases of cognitive dissonance and other psychological theories, which indicate that these theories are not plausible explanations concerning Jesus’ post-resurrection appearances.

Journal for the Study of the Historical JesusVol. 23(1)
Hong Kong Baptist University (HK), Newcastle University (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessing Psychological Explanations for Jesus’ Post-Resurrection Appearances — Nick Meader, Andrew Ter Ern Loke · Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS