Identifying climatically-compatible seedlots for the eastern US: building the predictive tools and knowledge to enable forest assisted migration

Introduction Global climate change and associated stressors threaten forest ecosystems due to the rapid pace of climate change, which could exceed the natural migration rate of some tree species. In response, there is growing interest to research and implement forest assisted migration (FAM). Here, we used a species-independent indicator based on climate analogy, according to the sigma (dis)similarity (σ d ) index, to match planting sites across the eastern US with (future) climatically-compatible seedlots (CCS). Methods We developed CCS for a grid composed of 1 × 1° of latitude and longitude. CCS were based on future climate analogs with ≤2σ d analogy to ensure CCS were representative of future climate change. CCS were located for three time periods, 2030's, 2050's, and 2090's and three emissions scenarios (SSP2-4.5, SSP3-7.0, and SSP5-8.5) from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 6 database, using 12 climate variables. Results CCS were identified for the majority of 1 × 1° grids based on the SSP3-7.0 scenario. Approximately 28% of 1 × 1° grid's 2090's projections included future climate novelty. The 2030's, 2050's, and 2090's CCS were located on average 222, 358, and 662 km or 1, 2, and 3 eastern seed zones away from the 1 × 1° grids, respectively. CCS were also located further south-southwest (188–197°). In addition, the average forest cover of CCS was approximately 2%, 5%, and 10% less than that of the 1 × 1° grids. Discussion Our development and synthesis of CCS emphasized four key results: (i) average distances to 2030's and 2050's CCS were similar to seed-transfer guidelines for some tree species, but 2090's CCS exceeded current recommendations; (ii) south-southwesterly locations of CCS aligned with tree species habitat distribution dynamics; (iii) future climate novelty potentially challenges the conceptual basis of FAM if tree species are not adapted to climate change; and (iv) variation in forest cover among CCS presents potential opportunities and challenges due the presence or absence of forestland to source seed. Ultimately, our goal was to locate and synthesize CCS that could enable FAM decision support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2024.1449340
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying climatically-compatible seedlots for the eastern US: building the predictive tools and knowledge to enable forest assisted migration

Anantha Prasad, Patricia Raymond, Christel C. Kern, Louis R. Iverson et al.
5 citations
Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
Species Distribution and Climate Change
4.60
article

Identifying climatically-compatible seedlots for the eastern US: building the predictive tools and knowledge to enable forest assisted migration

Anantha Prasad, Patricia Raymond, Christel C. Kern, Louis R. Iverson, Evan M. Rehm, Andrew V. Gougherty, Catherine Périé, Amanda M. McGraw, Bryce T. Adams, Jessica Miesel, Alejandro A. Royo, Dustin R. Bronson, Stephen N. Matthews
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Introduction Global climate change and associated stressors threaten forest ecosystems due to the rapid pace of climate change, which could exceed the natural migration rate of some tree species. In response, there is growing interest to research and implement forest assisted migration (FAM). Here, we used a species-independent indicator based on climate analogy, according to the sigma (dis)similarity (σ d ) index, to match planting sites across the eastern US with (future) climatically-compatible seedlots (CCS). Methods We developed CCS for a grid composed of 1 × 1° of latitude and longitude. CCS were based on future climate analogs with ≤2σ d analogy to ensure CCS were representative of future climate change. CCS were located for three time periods, 2030's, 2050's, and 2090's and three emissions scenarios (SSP2-4.5, SSP3-7.0, and SSP5-8.5) from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 6 database, using 12 climate variables. Results CCS were identified for the majority of 1 × 1° grids based on the SSP3-7.0 scenario. Approximately 28% of 1 × 1° grid's 2090's projections included future climate novelty. The 2030's, 2050's, and 2090's CCS were located on average 222, 358, and 662 km or 1, 2, and 3 eastern seed zones away from the 1 × 1° grids, respectively. CCS were also located further south-southwest (188–197°). In addition, the average forest cover of CCS was approximately 2%, 5%, and 10% less than that of the 1 × 1° grids. Discussion Our development and synthesis of CCS emphasized four key results: (i) average distances to 2030's and 2050's CCS were similar to seed-transfer guidelines for some tree species, but 2090's CCS exceeded current recommendations; (ii) south-southwesterly locations of CCS aligned with tree species habitat distribution dynamics; (iii) future climate novelty potentially challenges the conceptual basis of FAM if tree species are not adapted to climate change; and (iv) variation in forest cover among CCS presents potential opportunities and challenges due the presence or absence of forestland to source seed. Ultimately, our goal was to locate and synthesize CCS that could enable FAM decision support.

Frontiers in Forests and Global ChangeVol. 7
University of Idaho (US), Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (US), Northern Research Station (US), Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec) (CA), The Ohio State University (US)
Northern Research Station
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
4.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.