Exploring Valuable Indicators for Classifying Strong and Weak Patents Based on Invalidation Reexamination Decisions

Abstract Based on 8,666 invalidation reexamined China invention grant patents of decision dates from 2000 to 2021, the effect and value of eight indicators for classifying strong and weak patents in nine technology areas, including overall technology and eight technology sections, was thoroughly analyzed via ANOVA. Two high valuable indicators including abstract word count and examination duration for classification were found, which respectively showed significance in five technology areas. Four less valuable indicators, including claim count, figure count, inventor count and IPC count, were found to respectively show significance in one or two technology areas. A valueless indicator of applicant count was found to show none of significance in any technology areas. The strong patents did not always show higher indicator means of significance. Especially for the high valuable indicator of examination duration, the strong patents showed lower means in any of five technology areas of significance. The finding of this research would contribute the state of art in evaluating patents and help patent owners improve their patent asset management strategy. JEL classification numbers: C38, C46, G11, G12.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Management and Applied Economics
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47260/amae/1514
Primary Topic
Intellectual Property and Patents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Valuable Indicators for Classifying Strong and Weak Patents Based on Invalidation Reexamination Decisions

Hui‐Chung Che, Guangyun Deng, Yingwu Peng
Advances in Management and Applied Economics
Intellectual Property and Patents
article

Exploring Valuable Indicators for Classifying Strong and Weak Patents Based on Invalidation Reexamination Decisions

Hui‐Chung Che, Guangyun Deng, Yingwu Peng
article en

Abstract

Abstract Based on 8,666 invalidation reexamined China invention grant patents of decision dates from 2000 to 2021, the effect and value of eight indicators for classifying strong and weak patents in nine technology areas, including overall technology and eight technology sections, was thoroughly analyzed via ANOVA. Two high valuable indicators including abstract word count and examination duration for classification were found, which respectively showed significance in five technology areas. Four less valuable indicators, including claim count, figure count, inventor count and IPC count, were found to respectively show significance in one or two technology areas. A valueless indicator of applicant count was found to show none of significance in any technology areas. The strong patents did not always show higher indicator means of significance. Especially for the high valuable indicator of examination duration, the strong patents showed lower means in any of five technology areas of significance. The finding of this research would contribute the state of art in evaluating patents and help patent owners improve their patent asset management strategy. JEL classification numbers: C38, C46, G11, G12.

Advances in Management and Applied Economics
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Intellectual Property and Patents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring Valuable Indicators for Classifying Strong and Weak Patents Based on Invalidation Reexamination Decisions — Hui‐Chung Che, Guangyun Deng, et al. · Advances in Management and Applied Economics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS