Peng Chun Chang and the Justification for Human Rights in East Asia

Abstract This paper reviews recent scholarship on P.C. (Peng Chun) Chang’s pivotal roles as a Confucian and diplomat in the drafting of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights to argue that he articulated a pioneering Confucian justification for human rights, distinctive from then-influential Western, Christian justifications. However, it also argues that theorizing the human rights advocacy of mid-20th-century Confucians like Chang does not suffice on its own to advance the compatibilist case for Confucianism and human rights, especially when it is recalled how Chang’s advocacy was forgotten. Relative to the influential human rights advocacy of East Asian churches, Confucianism also suffers from a reputational deficit in East Asian human rights thought due to its lack of civic visibility and its negative associations with developmental authoritarianisms in East Asia. The paper concludes that Confucians aiming for a more authoritative Confucian advocacy of human rights must also acknowledge and confront this reputational deficit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Political Theory
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/26669773-bja10072
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Chinese history and philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Peng Chun Chang and the Justification for Human Rights in East Asia

Shaun O’Dwyer
1 citations
Comparative Political Theory
Chinese history and philosophy
1.13
article

Peng Chun Chang and the Justification for Human Rights in East Asia

Shaun O’Dwyer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper reviews recent scholarship on P.C. (Peng Chun) Chang’s pivotal roles as a Confucian and diplomat in the drafting of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights to argue that he articulated a pioneering Confucian justification for human rights, distinctive from then-influential Western, Christian justifications. However, it also argues that theorizing the human rights advocacy of mid-20th-century Confucians like Chang does not suffice on its own to advance the compatibilist case for Confucianism and human rights, especially when it is recalled how Chang’s advocacy was forgotten. Relative to the influential human rights advocacy of East Asian churches, Confucianism also suffers from a reputational deficit in East Asian human rights thought due to its lack of civic visibility and its negative associations with developmental authoritarianisms in East Asia. The paper concludes that Confucians aiming for a more authoritative Confucian advocacy of human rights must also acknowledge and confront this reputational deficit.

Comparative Political TheoryVol. 4(2)
Kyushu University (JP)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Chinese history and philosophy
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Peng Chun Chang and the Justification for Human Rights in East Asia — Shaun O’Dwyer · Comparative Political Theory (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS