Scholarly and Empirical Considerations on Expanding Access for Non-Governmental Organisations Before the European Court of Human Rights

Abstract Non-governmental organisations ( ngo s) have long been considered important actors within the European Convention on Human Rights ( echr ) system. Yet, their influence as litigants remains limited when a case with a specific individual, rather than a general situation, is put before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR or Court). This article evaluates the Court’s standing requirements and in doing so, brings together various perspectives on ngo s and the strategies they pursue. By drawing upon interviews with Court officials, ngo representatives, including those with experience litigating under the collective complaints procedure of the European Social Charter ( esc ), and experts who sit in the esc Committee, it includes a stakeholder perspective on the need to further allow ngo s to engage strategically before the Court and whether inspiration can be derived from the esc system, with specific focus on formalising greater access for ngo s.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The European Convention on Human Rights Law Review
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/26663236-bja10107
Primary Topic
European and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scholarly and Empirical Considerations on Expanding Access for Non-Governmental Organisations Before the European Court of Human Rights

Elif Erken
The European Convention on Human Rights Law Review
European and International Law Studies
article

Scholarly and Empirical Considerations on Expanding Access for Non-Governmental Organisations Before the European Court of Human Rights

Elif Erken
article en

Abstract

Abstract Non-governmental organisations ( ngo s) have long been considered important actors within the European Convention on Human Rights ( echr ) system. Yet, their influence as litigants remains limited when a case with a specific individual, rather than a general situation, is put before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR or Court). This article evaluates the Court’s standing requirements and in doing so, brings together various perspectives on ngo s and the strategies they pursue. By drawing upon interviews with Court officials, ngo representatives, including those with experience litigating under the collective complaints procedure of the European Social Charter ( esc ), and experts who sit in the esc Committee, it includes a stakeholder perspective on the need to further allow ngo s to engage strategically before the Court and whether inspiration can be derived from the esc system, with specific focus on formalising greater access for ngo s.

The European Convention on Human Rights Law ReviewVol. 6(2)
Utrecht University (NL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
European and International Law Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.