Sensitivity and impact of atmospheric forcings on hurricane wind wave modeling in the Gulf of Mexico using nested WAVEWATCH III

Precise estimation of hurricane wind-induced waves is critical to enhance the accuracy of predicting coastal flooding events in real-time besides helping in the design of sustainable coastal/offshore structures. In this study, we aim to investigate the importance of atmospheric forcings and their impact on wind wave modeling for extreme hurricane conditions in the Gulf of Mexico (GOM) basin. Hurricanes Michael (2018) and Ida (2021) were chosen to be modeled as they were among the two most severe storm events that attained category 5 and category 4 status, respectively, during landfall in the GOM basin. A multi-grid nested modeling approach was implemented in WAVEWATCH III with three different wind forcings: ECMWF's ERA5, NOAA's High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR: v3 and v4) and ECMWF's Operational High-Resolution Forecast Model (ECMWF) to model both hurricanes. The results generated through model simulations of various cases were compared with the field observations obtained at NDBC stations. One of the findings suggests that the ERA5 based wind model substantially underestimates the peak winds of both the hurricanes by 50–60 %, thereby resulting in significant underestimation of the wave heights by 40 %. Although the ECMWF model could not capture the maximum winds generated by Michael and Ida, it still gave better results than the ERA5 and HRRR (v3). The updated version (v4) of HRRR performed better than both ERA5 and ECMWF wind models in predicting the peak wind speeds and wind field distribution of Hurricane Ida in all the quadrants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Ocean Research
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2024.104320
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sensitivity and impact of atmospheric forcings on hurricane wind wave modeling in the Gulf of Mexico using nested WAVEWATCH III

C. Gowri Shankar, Tyler Hesser, Mustafa Kemal Cambazoğlu, Diana N. Bernstein et al.
5 citations
Applied Ocean Research
Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
2.40
article

Sensitivity and impact of atmospheric forcings on hurricane wind wave modeling in the Gulf of Mexico using nested WAVEWATCH III

C. Gowri Shankar, Tyler Hesser, Mustafa Kemal Cambazoğlu, Diana N. Bernstein, Jeremy David Wiggert
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Precise estimation of hurricane wind-induced waves is critical to enhance the accuracy of predicting coastal flooding events in real-time besides helping in the design of sustainable coastal/offshore structures. In this study, we aim to investigate the importance of atmospheric forcings and their impact on wind wave modeling for extreme hurricane conditions in the Gulf of Mexico (GOM) basin. Hurricanes Michael (2018) and Ida (2021) were chosen to be modeled as they were among the two most severe storm events that attained category 5 and category 4 status, respectively, during landfall in the GOM basin. A multi-grid nested modeling approach was implemented in WAVEWATCH III with three different wind forcings: ECMWF's ERA5, NOAA's High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR: v3 and v4) and ECMWF's Operational High-Resolution Forecast Model (ECMWF) to model both hurricanes. The results generated through model simulations of various cases were compared with the field observations obtained at NDBC stations. One of the findings suggests that the ERA5 based wind model substantially underestimates the peak winds of both the hurricanes by 50–60 %, thereby resulting in significant underestimation of the wave heights by 40 %. Although the ECMWF model could not capture the maximum winds generated by Michael and Ida, it still gave better results than the ERA5 and HRRR (v3). The updated version (v4) of HRRR performed better than both ERA5 and ECMWF wind models in predicting the peak wind speeds and wind field distribution of Hurricane Ida in all the quadrants.

Applied Ocean ResearchVol. 154
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Stennis Space Center (US), United States Army (US), University of Southern Mississippi (US), Renaissance Computing Institute (US), U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (US)
National Science Foundation, Engineer Research and Development Center
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
2.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.