INVESTIGATING THE USE AND SEMANTIC INTERPRETATION OF FIGURATIVE LANGUAGE IN EFL STUDENTS’ LITERARY WORK

This study aims to investigate the types of figurative language written in the students’ literary work, to identify the dominant of figurative language written in the students’ literary work, and to interpret the meaning of figurative language written in the student’s literary work. This is descriptive qualitative research. The scenario of taking the data were as follow; first, researcher took the data from the literary classroom. Second, researcher identify figurative language taken from student’s literary work. Third, interpreting the data based on the theory of figurative language written by Fatimah, Amri, and Rusan, (2020) and the theory of meaning developed by Umagandhi and Vinothini, (2017). Research findings stated there were six types of figurative language written by students in their literary works. Then, the dominant of figurative language written by students was hyperbole figurative and personification. Further, there were four types of semantics meaning written by students, such as; connotative, affective, reflected, and associative. Affective semantic meaning was the dominant meaning written in the students’ literary work. Affective meaning was found in the Personification figurative language. Further, Figurative languages and their semantics meaning were meaningful for learning and empowering students’ linguistics’ competences. Particularly it is in semantics discussion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
English Review Journal of English Education
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v12i3.10367
Primary Topic
Language Acquisition and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

INVESTIGATING THE USE AND SEMANTIC INTERPRETATION OF FIGURATIVE LANGUAGE IN EFL STUDENTS’ LITERARY WORK

Sudar Sudar
English Review Journal of English Education
Language Acquisition and Education
article

INVESTIGATING THE USE AND SEMANTIC INTERPRETATION OF FIGURATIVE LANGUAGE IN EFL STUDENTS’ LITERARY WORK

Sudar Sudar
article en

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the types of figurative language written in the students’ literary work, to identify the dominant of figurative language written in the students’ literary work, and to interpret the meaning of figurative language written in the student’s literary work. This is descriptive qualitative research. The scenario of taking the data were as follow; first, researcher took the data from the literary classroom. Second, researcher identify figurative language taken from student’s literary work. Third, interpreting the data based on the theory of figurative language written by Fatimah, Amri, and Rusan, (2020) and the theory of meaning developed by Umagandhi and Vinothini, (2017). Research findings stated there were six types of figurative language written by students in their literary works. Then, the dominant of figurative language written by students was hyperbole figurative and personification. Further, there were four types of semantics meaning written by students, such as; connotative, affective, reflected, and associative. Affective semantic meaning was the dominant meaning written in the students’ literary work. Affective meaning was found in the Personification figurative language. Further, Figurative languages and their semantics meaning were meaningful for learning and empowering students’ linguistics’ competences. Particularly it is in semantics discussion.

English Review Journal of English EducationVol. 12(3)
Universitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo (ID)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Language Acquisition and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.