A unified framework for the error analysis of physics-informed neural networks

Abstract We prove a priori and a posteriori error estimates for physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for linear PDEs. We analyze elliptic equations in primal and mixed form, elasticity, parabolic, hyperbolic and Stokes equations, and a PDE constrained optimization problem. For the analysis, we propose an abstract framework in the common language of bilinear forms, and we show that coercivity and continuity lead to error estimates. The obtained estimates are sharp and reveal that the $L^{2}$ penalty approach for initial and boundary conditions in the PINN formulation weakens the norm of the error decay. Finally, utilizing recent advances in PINN optimization, we present numerical examples that illustrate the ability of the method to achieve accurate solutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/imanum/drae081
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.94

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A unified framework for the error analysis of physics-informed neural networks

Kent‐André Mardal, Marius Zeinhofer, Rami Masri
14 citations
IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
3.94
article

A unified framework for the error analysis of physics-informed neural networks

Kent‐André Mardal, Marius Zeinhofer, Rami Masri
article en
14 citations

Abstract

Abstract We prove a priori and a posteriori error estimates for physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for linear PDEs. We analyze elliptic equations in primal and mixed form, elasticity, parabolic, hyperbolic and Stokes equations, and a PDE constrained optimization problem. For the analysis, we propose an abstract framework in the common language of bilinear forms, and we show that coercivity and continuity lead to error estimates. The obtained estimates are sharp and reveal that the $L^{2}$ penalty approach for initial and boundary conditions in the PINN formulation weakens the norm of the error decay. Finally, utilizing recent advances in PINN optimization, we present numerical examples that illustrate the ability of the method to achieve accurate solutions.

IMA Journal of Numerical AnalysisVol. 45(5)
University of Oslo (NO), Simula Research Laboratory (NO)
Norges Forskningsråd, H2020 European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
3.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A unified framework for the error analysis of physics-informed neural networks — Kent‐André Mardal, Marius Zeinhofer, et al. · IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS