Comparison between Ultrasound Guided Femoral Nerve Block versus IPACK Block (Interspace between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Posterior Knee) in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Replacement on Postoperative Ambulation and Pain

Abstract Background Total knee replacement (TKR) is a well-known popular surgical procedure for knee diseases, including end-stage knee osteoarthritis that causes severe postoperative pain and prolonged immobility. TKR is associated with significant postoperative pain. The need for effective analgesia without compromising function is a priority. Aim of the Work The current study aims to assess the IPACK block concerning postoperative ambulation as a primary outcome and analgesic efficacy as a secondary outcome when compared with femoral nerve block following TKR. Patients and Methods This study is a randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on 40 random patients who were scheduled to undergo total knee replacement and were divided into 2 equal groups: Group A: Patients in group A (n = 20) received spinal anesthesia followed by FNB block at the beginning of the operation with 20ml bupivacaine (0.25%) under complete aseptic conditions, Group B: Patients in group B (n = 20) received spinal anesthesia followed by IPACK at the beginning of the operation with 20ml bupivacaine (0.25%) under complete aseptic conditions. Results As for the comparison between effect of the IPACK block and FNB regarding ambulation and postoperative pain in TKR, it showed that there is significance regarding ambulation that was delayed in FNB than IPACK using TUG test and 10-min walk test, but regarding VAS score that was used to assess postoperative pain and its intensity, it showed that FNB has more analgesic effect concerning IPACK block with less total analgesics consumption (in mg.) over 24-hour period post-operative. Conclusion Our study showed that there was delayed ambulation in FNB than in IPACK using the TUG test and 10-min walk test, but regarding the VAS score that was used to assess postoperative pain and its intensity, it showed that FNB has more analgesic effect concerning IPACK block with less total analgesics consumption (in mg.) over 24-hour period post-operative.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
QJM
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcae175.004
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison between Ultrasound Guided Femoral Nerve Block versus IPACK Block (Interspace between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Posterior Knee) in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Replacement on Postoperative Ambulation and Pain

Adham Magdy Haggag, Mostafa M. Hussein, Sherif Sayed Ali Sultan, Abdelrahman Atef Abdelkhalek Elsayed Elkaranily
QJM
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Comparison between Ultrasound Guided Femoral Nerve Block versus IPACK Block (Interspace between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Posterior Knee) in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Replacement on Postoperative Ambulation and Pain

Adham Magdy Haggag, Mostafa M. Hussein, Sherif Sayed Ali Sultan, Abdelrahman Atef Abdelkhalek Elsayed Elkaranily
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Total knee replacement (TKR) is a well-known popular surgical procedure for knee diseases, including end-stage knee osteoarthritis that causes severe postoperative pain and prolonged immobility. TKR is associated with significant postoperative pain. The need for effective analgesia without compromising function is a priority. Aim of the Work The current study aims to assess the IPACK block concerning postoperative ambulation as a primary outcome and analgesic efficacy as a secondary outcome when compared with femoral nerve block following TKR. Patients and Methods This study is a randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on 40 random patients who were scheduled to undergo total knee replacement and were divided into 2 equal groups: Group A: Patients in group A (n = 20) received spinal anesthesia followed by FNB block at the beginning of the operation with 20ml bupivacaine (0.25%) under complete aseptic conditions, Group B: Patients in group B (n = 20) received spinal anesthesia followed by IPACK at the beginning of the operation with 20ml bupivacaine (0.25%) under complete aseptic conditions. Results As for the comparison between effect of the IPACK block and FNB regarding ambulation and postoperative pain in TKR, it showed that there is significance regarding ambulation that was delayed in FNB than IPACK using TUG test and 10-min walk test, but regarding VAS score that was used to assess postoperative pain and its intensity, it showed that FNB has more analgesic effect concerning IPACK block with less total analgesics consumption (in mg.) over 24-hour period post-operative. Conclusion Our study showed that there was delayed ambulation in FNB than in IPACK using the TUG test and 10-min walk test, but regarding the VAS score that was used to assess postoperative pain and its intensity, it showed that FNB has more analgesic effect concerning IPACK block with less total analgesics consumption (in mg.) over 24-hour period post-operative.

QJMVol. 117(Supplement_2)
Ain Shams University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.