Outcomes after Deep Brain Stimulation for Generalized Dystonia

Abstract Background Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is an already established treatment option for refractory dystonia. Its main targets are currently the globus pallidus internus (GPi) and the subthalamic nucleus (STN) with similar motor and disability outcomes, 50 to 70% in isolated generalized/segmental inherited/idiopathic dystonia. This systematic review and meta- analysis aimed to assess the efficacy outcomes of DBS use in patients with generalized dystonia. Methods This study was conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the searched strategy was developed using the Mesh Database to find the similar keywords to the main keywords in our study. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar for eligible articles to be included in our study using the following search strategy: (Brain Stimulations OR Deep Brain Stimulations OR Brain Stimulation OR Deep Brain Stimulation OR Electrical Stimulation of the Brain) AND (movement disorders OR dystonia syndromes OR dystonia). Results A total of 25 articles were included in our meta-analysis. The pooled analysis of 25 studies showed the improvement in the BFMDRS-movement score after deep brain stimulation as evident by the decrease in the pos-DBS values with an overall mean difference of -25.96 (95%CI: -29.24 - -22.69, p < 0.00001) with moderate heterogeneity (I2=51%, p = 0.002). Regarding BFMDRS-disability score, it was statistically significant reduced after deep brain stimulation compared to pre-operative values with an overall mean difference of -5.69 (95%CI: -7.04 - -4.35, p < 0.00001) and moderate heterogeneity (I2=50%, p = 0.02). Conclusion Our study demonstrated the deep brain stimulation's excellent efficacy across various parameters. This included mobility and disability on the BFMDRS, while the use of DBS is linked to improved post-operative results when compared to pre-operative values. Furthermore, according to the SF-36, which measures both mental and physical performance, DBS has demonstrated a high efficacy on quality of life. Furthermore, DBS was linked to a considerable decline in depressed symptoms, as demonstrated by the BDI score, which dropped dramatically in individuals with generalized dystonia following DBS application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
QJM
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcae175.563
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neurological disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outcomes after Deep Brain Stimulation for Generalized Dystonia

Hesham Radwan, Tarek Salem, Hassan El-Sayed Hassan Zoghdan, Mohamed Gamal Youssef El-Mashad
1 citations
QJM
Neurological disorders and treatments
0.37
article

Outcomes after Deep Brain Stimulation for Generalized Dystonia

Hesham Radwan, Tarek Salem, Hassan El-Sayed Hassan Zoghdan, Mohamed Gamal Youssef El-Mashad
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is an already established treatment option for refractory dystonia. Its main targets are currently the globus pallidus internus (GPi) and the subthalamic nucleus (STN) with similar motor and disability outcomes, 50 to 70% in isolated generalized/segmental inherited/idiopathic dystonia. This systematic review and meta- analysis aimed to assess the efficacy outcomes of DBS use in patients with generalized dystonia. Methods This study was conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the searched strategy was developed using the Mesh Database to find the similar keywords to the main keywords in our study. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar for eligible articles to be included in our study using the following search strategy: (Brain Stimulations OR Deep Brain Stimulations OR Brain Stimulation OR Deep Brain Stimulation OR Electrical Stimulation of the Brain) AND (movement disorders OR dystonia syndromes OR dystonia). Results A total of 25 articles were included in our meta-analysis. The pooled analysis of 25 studies showed the improvement in the BFMDRS-movement score after deep brain stimulation as evident by the decrease in the pos-DBS values with an overall mean difference of -25.96 (95%CI: -29.24 - -22.69, p < 0.00001) with moderate heterogeneity (I2=51%, p = 0.002). Regarding BFMDRS-disability score, it was statistically significant reduced after deep brain stimulation compared to pre-operative values with an overall mean difference of -5.69 (95%CI: -7.04 - -4.35, p < 0.00001) and moderate heterogeneity (I2=50%, p = 0.02). Conclusion Our study demonstrated the deep brain stimulation's excellent efficacy across various parameters. This included mobility and disability on the BFMDRS, while the use of DBS is linked to improved post-operative results when compared to pre-operative values. Furthermore, according to the SF-36, which measures both mental and physical performance, DBS has demonstrated a high efficacy on quality of life. Furthermore, DBS was linked to a considerable decline in depressed symptoms, as demonstrated by the BDI score, which dropped dramatically in individuals with generalized dystonia following DBS application.

QJMVol. 117(Supplement_2)
Ain Shams University (EG), Kafrelsheikh University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Neurological disorders and treatments
0.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.