Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine versus Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine-Dexmedetomidine for Postoperative Analgesia after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Abstract Background Although laparoscopic operations are minimally invasive, many patients report moderate-to- severe pain in the early postoperative period, which is multifactorial and requires multimodal analgesia to relieve it. Pain after laparoscopic surgery is caused by three mechanisms: parietal, visceral, and shoulder pain. As a result, numerous studies were done to develop methods for good postoperative pain control. Aim of the Work This study aims to compare the efficacy of intravenous dexmedetomidine versus intraperitoneal bupivacaine-dexmedetomidine for postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients and Methods The study was conducted on 52 patients aged 21 to 60 years, of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I or II scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia in Ain Shams University Hospitals after approval of the medical ethical committee. They were allocated to two groups of 26 patients each: Group A: (n = 26): Patients received an intravenous infusion of 50 ml of normal saline containing dexmedetomidine 1μg/kg over 10 minutes after removal of the gall bladder, Group B: (n = 26): Patients received intraperitoneal instillation of dexmedetomidine 1μg/kg plus 40 ml of bupivacaine 0.25%. Results There was a statistically significant difference between both groups regarding pain control and postoperative analgesic requirements while there was no significant difference between both groups regarding the demographic data and postoperative side effects (hypotension, bradycardia, nausea, and vomiting). Both intravenous dexmedetomidine and intraperitoneal bupivacaine-dexmedetomidine were effective for postoperative pain control after laparoscopic cholecystectomy but the intraperitoneal route provided a longer duration of analgesia and the lower postoperative analgesic consumption Conclusion The present study concluded that patients who received intraperitoneal administration of bupivacaine-dexmedetomidine had less VAS with a longer duration of analgesia and lower postoperative analgesic consumption than those who received intravenous dexmedetomidine.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
QJM
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcae175.050
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine versus Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine-Dexmedetomidine for Postoperative Analgesia after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Mai M. Abd El-Aziz, Safaa Ishak Ghaly Tawadros, Dalia Abd El-Hamid Mohamed Nasr El-Din, Maria Asaad Louis Wassily
QJM
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine versus Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine-Dexmedetomidine for Postoperative Analgesia after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Mai M. Abd El-Aziz, Safaa Ishak Ghaly Tawadros, Dalia Abd El-Hamid Mohamed Nasr El-Din, Maria Asaad Louis Wassily
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Although laparoscopic operations are minimally invasive, many patients report moderate-to- severe pain in the early postoperative period, which is multifactorial and requires multimodal analgesia to relieve it. Pain after laparoscopic surgery is caused by three mechanisms: parietal, visceral, and shoulder pain. As a result, numerous studies were done to develop methods for good postoperative pain control. Aim of the Work This study aims to compare the efficacy of intravenous dexmedetomidine versus intraperitoneal bupivacaine-dexmedetomidine for postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients and Methods The study was conducted on 52 patients aged 21 to 60 years, of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I or II scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia in Ain Shams University Hospitals after approval of the medical ethical committee. They were allocated to two groups of 26 patients each: Group A: (n = 26): Patients received an intravenous infusion of 50 ml of normal saline containing dexmedetomidine 1μg/kg over 10 minutes after removal of the gall bladder, Group B: (n = 26): Patients received intraperitoneal instillation of dexmedetomidine 1μg/kg plus 40 ml of bupivacaine 0.25%. Results There was a statistically significant difference between both groups regarding pain control and postoperative analgesic requirements while there was no significant difference between both groups regarding the demographic data and postoperative side effects (hypotension, bradycardia, nausea, and vomiting). Both intravenous dexmedetomidine and intraperitoneal bupivacaine-dexmedetomidine were effective for postoperative pain control after laparoscopic cholecystectomy but the intraperitoneal route provided a longer duration of analgesia and the lower postoperative analgesic consumption Conclusion The present study concluded that patients who received intraperitoneal administration of bupivacaine-dexmedetomidine had less VAS with a longer duration of analgesia and lower postoperative analgesic consumption than those who received intravenous dexmedetomidine.

QJMVol. 117(Supplement_2)
Ain Shams University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.