Comparison of 21 Gauge vs 25 Gauge Needles in US Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology of Thyroid Nodules

Abstract Background Thyroid nodules are frequent among the general population. Ultrasound is the most commonly used imaging technique in the evaluation of thyroid nodules, Fine needle cytology (FNC) has been routinely used as the baseline investigation for diagnosis of nodular thyroid disease. Its advantages include minimal invasion and high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Objective Our aim is to compare the sample adequacy of FNA sample obtained by 21 gauge needle versus 25 gauge needle, aiming to improve the overall quality of FNC and hence better evaluation of thyroid nodules avoiding repeating FNC and unnecessary thyroidectomies. Patients and Methods Our study was conducted on 22 adult patients with thyroid nodules, whose ages range between 17 and 68 years old and were referred to undergo FNA procedures. Results 22 patients with thyroid nodules were included in this study, the mean of Mayers score was 4.23 ± 2.18 and ranged from 1 to 8, while most of patients were adequate by (72.73%). Regarding the difference between two groups in Mayers score & adequacy, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in Mayers score nor adequacy (as P-value >0.05). Conclusion In conclusion concerning the diagnostic accuracy either 21- or 25-gauge needles can be used. We recommend using 21 gauge needles for markedly calcified nodules, because 25-gauge needles bend more easily in such cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
QJM
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcae175.934
Primary Topic
Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of 21 Gauge vs 25 Gauge Needles in US Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology of Thyroid Nodules

Somaia A. Saad El-Din, Mohamed Shaker Ghazy, Omnia Ahmed Sayam, Mahmoud Ibrahim Hatata
QJM
Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Comparison of 21 Gauge vs 25 Gauge Needles in US Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology of Thyroid Nodules

Somaia A. Saad El-Din, Mohamed Shaker Ghazy, Omnia Ahmed Sayam, Mahmoud Ibrahim Hatata
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Thyroid nodules are frequent among the general population. Ultrasound is the most commonly used imaging technique in the evaluation of thyroid nodules, Fine needle cytology (FNC) has been routinely used as the baseline investigation for diagnosis of nodular thyroid disease. Its advantages include minimal invasion and high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Objective Our aim is to compare the sample adequacy of FNA sample obtained by 21 gauge needle versus 25 gauge needle, aiming to improve the overall quality of FNC and hence better evaluation of thyroid nodules avoiding repeating FNC and unnecessary thyroidectomies. Patients and Methods Our study was conducted on 22 adult patients with thyroid nodules, whose ages range between 17 and 68 years old and were referred to undergo FNA procedures. Results 22 patients with thyroid nodules were included in this study, the mean of Mayers score was 4.23 ± 2.18 and ranged from 1 to 8, while most of patients were adequate by (72.73%). Regarding the difference between two groups in Mayers score & adequacy, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in Mayers score nor adequacy (as P-value >0.05). Conclusion In conclusion concerning the diagnostic accuracy either 21- or 25-gauge needles can be used. We recommend using 21 gauge needles for markedly calcified nodules, because 25-gauge needles bend more easily in such cases.

QJMVol. 117(Supplement_2)
Ain Shams University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.