Functional Outcome after Treatment of Three-Part Proximal Humerus Fractures Using Locking Plate vs. Conservative Treatment in the Elderly

Abstract Background Proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) are among the most common fractures in the elderly. The majority of proximal humeral fractures are treated conservatively, and up to 33% are treated surgically. Objective To compare functional outcome and quality of life after treatment of displaced 3-part proximal humerus fractures using the locking plates, as compared to nonoperative treatment in elderly patients. Methods This study performed a search for all published articles locking plates or nonoperative treatment in the management of displaced 3-part proximal humerus fractures. Results The pooled analysis of the included studies showed no significant difference between conservative treatment and operative treatment regarding the outcome of Constant score (MD = 0.04; 95% CI:[-0.2, 0.29]; P = 0.748). The pooled analysis of the included studies showed no significant difference in postoperative the DASH score between conservative treatment and operative treatment (MD = 0.05; 95% CI:[-0.35, 0.25]; P = 0.48). The pooled analysis of the included studies showed no significant difference in the outcome of VAS score between conservative treatment and operative treatment (MD = 0.38; 95% CI:[0.07, 0.69]; P = 0.748). The pooled analysis of the included studies showed no significant difference in ROM between conservative treatment and operative treatment (MD = 0.39; 95% CI:[-0.15, 0.94]; P = 0.425). The pooled analysis of the included studies showed no significant difference in postoperative complications between conservative treatment and operative treatment (RR = 1.148; 95% CI:[0.369 3.575]; P = 0.507). The pooled analysis of the included studies showed no significant difference in the outcome of non-union rate between conservative treatment and operative treatment (RR = 0.85; 95% CI: [0.72 – 2.28]; P = 0.158). Conclusion The results of this meta-analysis revealed no significant differences between conservative treatment and operative treatment as regard constant scores, DASH and VAS scores, range of movement, incidence of complications or non-union.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
QJM
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcae175.640
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Functional Outcome after Treatment of Three-Part Proximal Humerus Fractures Using Locking Plate vs. Conservative Treatment in the Elderly

Ayman Abdelaziz Bassiony, Azlina Ishak, Waleed Elsayed Abd EL-Aleem Elshabrawy
QJM
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

Functional Outcome after Treatment of Three-Part Proximal Humerus Fractures Using Locking Plate vs. Conservative Treatment in the Elderly

Ayman Abdelaziz Bassiony, Azlina Ishak, Waleed Elsayed Abd EL-Aleem Elshabrawy
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) are among the most common fractures in the elderly. The majority of proximal humeral fractures are treated conservatively, and up to 33% are treated surgically. Objective To compare functional outcome and quality of life after treatment of displaced 3-part proximal humerus fractures using the locking plates, as compared to nonoperative treatment in elderly patients. Methods This study performed a search for all published articles locking plates or nonoperative treatment in the management of displaced 3-part proximal humerus fractures. Results The pooled analysis of the included studies showed no significant difference between conservative treatment and operative treatment regarding the outcome of Constant score (MD = 0.04; 95% CI:[-0.2, 0.29]; P = 0.748). The pooled analysis of the included studies showed no significant difference in postoperative the DASH score between conservative treatment and operative treatment (MD = 0.05; 95% CI:[-0.35, 0.25]; P = 0.48). The pooled analysis of the included studies showed no significant difference in the outcome of VAS score between conservative treatment and operative treatment (MD = 0.38; 95% CI:[0.07, 0.69]; P = 0.748). The pooled analysis of the included studies showed no significant difference in ROM between conservative treatment and operative treatment (MD = 0.39; 95% CI:[-0.15, 0.94]; P = 0.425). The pooled analysis of the included studies showed no significant difference in postoperative complications between conservative treatment and operative treatment (RR = 1.148; 95% CI:[0.369 3.575]; P = 0.507). The pooled analysis of the included studies showed no significant difference in the outcome of non-union rate between conservative treatment and operative treatment (RR = 0.85; 95% CI: [0.72 – 2.28]; P = 0.158). Conclusion The results of this meta-analysis revealed no significant differences between conservative treatment and operative treatment as regard constant scores, DASH and VAS scores, range of movement, incidence of complications or non-union.

QJMVol. 117(Supplement_2)
Ain Shams University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.