Transparency after <i>Fish Legal</i> : Private actors and access to environmental information in the United Kingdom

This article examines the meaning of ‘public authorities’ under the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (EIR) since 2015, when it was decided in Fish Legal that private water companies in England and Wales are public authorities for EIR purposes. Whilst that decision was considered a victory for transparency as it now means that private water companies have a legal obligation to provide access to environmental information, this article argues that the tests established in Fish Legal have introduced a high threshold that relatively few other private bodies have met, despite performing what are arguably public functions. As a result, access to environmental information is effectively limited due to the increasing participation of the private sector in delivering public services. Through an examination of the decisions taken since Fish Legal , this article exposes the limitations of the current functional approach to designation and argues that a renewed approach to environmental transparency is needed to ensure that information and participation rights are not diminished by privatisation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Law Review
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14614529241295605
Primary Topic
Environmental law and policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transparency after Fish Legal : Private actors and access to environmental information in the United Kingdom

Erin C. Ferguson
Environmental Law Review
Environmental law and policy
article

Transparency after Fish Legal : Private actors and access to environmental information in the United Kingdom

Erin C. Ferguson
article en

Abstract

This article examines the meaning of ‘public authorities’ under the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (EIR) since 2015, when it was decided in Fish Legal that private water companies in England and Wales are public authorities for EIR purposes. Whilst that decision was considered a victory for transparency as it now means that private water companies have a legal obligation to provide access to environmental information, this article argues that the tests established in Fish Legal have introduced a high threshold that relatively few other private bodies have met, despite performing what are arguably public functions. As a result, access to environmental information is effectively limited due to the increasing participation of the private sector in delivering public services. Through an examination of the decisions taken since Fish Legal , this article exposes the limitations of the current functional approach to designation and argues that a renewed approach to environmental transparency is needed to ensure that information and participation rights are not diminished by privatisation.

Environmental Law ReviewVol. 27(1)
University of Aberdeen (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Environmental law and policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Transparency after <i>Fish Legal</i> : Private actors and access to environmental information in the United Kingdom — Erin C. Ferguson · Environmental Law Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS